PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISTB vs. IVV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISTB vs. IVV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISTB achieves a 0.49% return, which is significantly lower than IVV's 10.85% return. Over the past 10 years, ISTB has underperformed IVV with an annualized return of 2.27%, while IVV has yielded a comparatively higher 15.54% annualized return.


ISTB

1D
-0.08%
1M
0.15%
YTD
0.49%
6M
0.71%
1Y
4.19%
3Y*
4.95%
5Y*
1.85%
10Y*
2.27%

IVV

1D
-0.76%
1M
4.97%
YTD
10.85%
6M
10.87%
1Y
28.00%
3Y*
22.43%
5Y*
13.88%
10Y*
15.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISTB vs. IVV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
0.49%6.36%4.37%5.56%-6.08%-0.71%4.75%5.61%1.02%1.72%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
10.85%17.85%24.93%26.31%-18.16%28.76%18.40%31.07%-4.49%21.75%

Correlation

The correlation between ISTB and IVV is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.28

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.09

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2012

0.05

Over the past year, ISTB and IVV have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.05, meaning their price movements have been converging.

ISTB vs. IVV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISTB
IVV

Utilities

99.4%
2.4%

Real Estate

0.6%
1.9%

Basic Materials

-

1.8%

Communication Services

-

11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.1%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.9%

Energy

-

3.5%

Financial Services

-

11.8%

Healthcare

-

8.5%

Industrials

-

8.3%

Technology

-

35.6%

Utilities

ISTB
99.4%
IVV
2.4%

Real Estate

ISTB
0.6%
IVV
1.9%

Basic Materials

ISTB

-

IVV
1.8%

Communication Services

ISTB

-

IVV
11.2%

Consumer Cyclical

ISTB

-

IVV
10.1%

Consumer Defensive

ISTB

-

IVV
4.9%

Energy

ISTB

-

IVV
3.5%

Financial Services

ISTB

-

IVV
11.8%

Healthcare

ISTB

-

IVV
8.5%

Industrials

ISTB

-

IVV
8.3%

Technology

ISTB

-

IVV
35.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISTB vs. IVV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISTB
ISTB Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
ISTB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISTB Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISTB Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
ISTB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISTB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

IVV
IVV Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IVV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IVV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
IVV Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
IVV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
IVV Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISTB vs. IVV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) and iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISTBIVVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.44

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.43

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.34

3.17

+0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.72

14.71

-1.99

ISTB vs. IVV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISTB Sharpe Ratio is 2.37, which is comparable to the IVV Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISTB and IVV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISTBIVVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.37

2.39

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

0.83

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.86

+0.05

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.84

0.45

+0.39

Drawdowns

ISTB vs. IVV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISTB drawdown since its inception was -9.34%, smaller than the maximum IVV drawdown of -55.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISTB and IVV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISTBIVVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.34%

-55.25%

+45.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.26%

-8.89%

+7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.36%

-18.75%

+17.39%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.34%

-24.53%

+15.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-9.34%

-33.90%

+24.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.42%

-0.76%

+0.34%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.22%

-10.78%

+9.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.33%

1.91%

-1.58%

Volatility

ISTB vs. IVV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF (ISTB) is 0.54%, while iShares Core S&P 500 ETF (IVV) has a volatility of 2.87%. This indicates that ISTB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IVV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISTBIVVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.54%

2.87%

-2.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.28%

8.90%

-7.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77%

11.80%

-10.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.79%

16.88%

-14.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

2.51%

18.05%

-15.54%

ISTB vs. IVV - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISTB has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is higher than IVV's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISTB vs. IVV - Dividend Comparison

ISTB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.25%, more than IVV's 1.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISTB
iShares Core 1-5 Year USD Bond ETF
4.25%4.12%3.83%2.97%2.01%1.69%2.20%2.75%2.57%2.06%1.90%1.58%
IVV
iShares Core S&P 500 ETF
1.06%1.17%1.30%1.44%1.66%1.20%1.57%1.85%2.21%1.75%2.01%2.27%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISTB and IVV have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IVV has higher volatility (2.87%) compared to ISTB (0.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISTB dropped -9.34% vs IVV's -55.25%.

On 10-year performance, IVV leads with 15.54% vs 2.27% for ISTB. On fees, IVV is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, ISTB has been the lower-risk option at 0.54%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, IVV has performed better with a 15.54% return vs 2.27%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

IVV is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.06% for ISTB.

ISTB has the higher dividend yield at 4.25%, compared with 1.06% for IVV.

ISTB is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while IVV is S&P 500. ISTB tracks BBG US Universal 1-5 Year Index (USD), while IVV tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for ISTB and 0.03% for IVV.

IVV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.37), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISTB and IVV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer