ISSC vs. NBCM

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

ISSC (Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.) is a stock, while NBCM (Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF) is Commodities fund actively managed by Neuberger Berman. Over the past 3 years, ISSC returned 35.37%/yr vs 13.90%/yr for NBCM. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ISSC vs. NBCM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) and Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISSC achieves a -10.30% return, which is significantly lower than NBCM's 17.97% return.

ISSC

• 1D: 2.10%
• 1M: 2.04%
• YTD: -10.30%
• 6M: -12.96%
• 1Y: 29.89%
• 3Y*: 35.37%
• 5Y*: 21.57%
• 10Y*: 20.99%

NBCM

• 1D: 1.83%
• 1M: -8.91%
• YTD: 17.97%
• 6M: 15.79%
• 1Y: 30.12%
• 3Y*: 13.90%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISSC vs. NBCM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
ISSC Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.	-10.30%	121.78%	0.12%	3.77%	-8.36%
NBCM Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF	17.97%	17.45%	6.55%	-6.41%	5.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ISSC and NBCM is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.05
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.01
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2022	0.06

The correlation between ISSC and NBCM shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.06 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ISSC vs. NBCM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISSC

ISSC Risk / Return Rank: 57
ISSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ISSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
ISSC Omega Ratio Rank: 59
ISSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
ISSC Martin Ratio Rank: 54

NBCM

NBCM Risk / Return Rank: 53
NBCM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 58
NBCM Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
NBCM Omega Ratio Rank: 56
NBCM Calmar Ratio Rank: 46
NBCM Martin Ratio Rank: 55

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISSC vs. NBCM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) and Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISSC	NBCM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.36	1.71	-1.35
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.11	2.23	-1.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.31	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.52	2.05	-1.53
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.92	8.44	-7.52

ISSC vs. NBCM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISSC Sharpe Ratio is 0.36, which is lower than the NBCM Sharpe Ratio of 1.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISSC and NBCM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISSC vs. NBCM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISSC drawdown since its inception was -89.03%, which is greater than NBCM's maximum drawdown of -14.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISSC and NBCM.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISSC	NBCM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-89.03%	-14.78%	-74.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-57.83%	-14.78%	-43.05%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-57.83%	-14.78%	-43.05%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-57.83%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-62.41%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.40%	-13.22%	-31.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-50.58%	-4.27%	-46.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	32.62%	3.58%	+29.04%

Volatility

ISSC vs. NBCM - Volatility Comparison

Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc. (ISSC) has a higher volatility of 19.93% compared to Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF (NBCM) at 4.45%. This indicates that ISSC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NBCM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISSC	NBCM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	19.93%	4.45%	+15.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	57.48%	15.79%	+41.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	83.29%	17.71%	+65.58%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	59.20%	14.99%	+44.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	57.19%	14.99%	+42.20%

Dividends

ISSC vs. NBCM - Dividend Comparison

ISSC has not paid dividends to shareholders, while NBCM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.17%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
ISSC Innovative Solutions and Support, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	0.00%	17.64%
NBCM Neuberger Berman Commodity Strategy ETF	7.17%	8.46%	5.22%	4.37%	0.80%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISSC and NBCM in my portfolio?

ISSC and NBCM have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISSC or NBCM?

ISSC has higher volatility (19.93%) compared to NBCM (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISSC dropped -89.03% vs NBCM's -14.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NBCM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.