PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISPY vs. OMAH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISPY vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (ISPY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISPY achieves a 9.60% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 4.56% return.


ISPY

1D
-0.71%
1M
5.60%
YTD
9.60%
6M
9.77%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

OMAH

1D
-0.70%
1M
0.44%
YTD
4.56%
6M
4.00%
1Y
11.44%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISPY vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ISPY and OMAH is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025

0.57

The correlation between ISPY and OMAH shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISPY vs. OMAH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISPY
OMAH

Technology

32.3%
13.6%

Financial Services

19.8%
38.9%

Communication Services

9.0%
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
4.1%

Healthcare

7.2%
7.0%

Industrials

6.4%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%
16.2%

Energy

2.9%
10.5%

Utilities

2.2%

-

Real Estate

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

1.5%

-

Technology

ISPY
32.3%
OMAH
13.6%

Financial Services

ISPY
19.8%
OMAH
38.9%

Communication Services

ISPY
9.0%
OMAH
9.8%

Consumer Cyclical

ISPY
8.4%
OMAH
4.1%

Healthcare

ISPY
7.2%
OMAH
7.0%

Industrials

ISPY
6.4%
OMAH

-

Consumer Defensive

ISPY
4.0%
OMAH
16.2%

Energy

ISPY
2.9%
OMAH
10.5%

Utilities

ISPY
2.2%
OMAH

-

Real Estate

ISPY
1.6%
OMAH

-

Basic Materials

ISPY
1.5%
OMAH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISPY vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISPY
ISPY Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ISPY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPY Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPY Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPY Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPY Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank

OMAH
OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 5454
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISPY vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (ISPY) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISPYOMAHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.25

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.82

-0.80

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.90

9.48

+3.42

ISPY vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISPY Sharpe Ratio is 2.22, which is higher than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISPY and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISPYOMAHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.22

1.43

+0.79

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.41

0.70

+0.71

Drawdowns

ISPY vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISPY drawdown since its inception was -16.88%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPY and OMAH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISPYOMAHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.88%

-11.83%

-5.05%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.43%

-3.00%

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.71%

-2.65%

+1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.08%

-1.26%

-0.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

1.21%

+0.76%

Volatility

ISPY vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF (ISPY) has a higher volatility of 3.72% compared to VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) at 1.93%. This indicates that ISPY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISPYOMAHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.72%

1.93%

+1.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.62%

5.49%

+3.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.47%

8.05%

+3.42%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.56%

13.21%

+0.35%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.56%

13.21%

+0.35%

ISPY vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISPY has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISPY vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

ISPY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than OMAH's 15.44% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ISPY
ProShares S&P 500 High Income ETF
4.41%8.56%9.84%
OMAH
VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF
15.44%12.86%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISPY and OMAH have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISPY has higher volatility (3.72%) compared to OMAH (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISPY dropped -16.88% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

On 1-year performance, ISPY leads with 25.33% vs 11.44% for OMAH. On fees, ISPY is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, OMAH has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISPY has performed better with a 25.33% return vs 11.44%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISPY is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.44%, compared with 4.41% for ISPY.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ISPY and 0.95% for OMAH.

ISPY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISPY and OMAH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer