PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISPA.DE vs. XDEM.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISPA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISPA.DE achieves a 14.48% return, which is significantly lower than XDEM.DE's 29.03% return. Over the past 10 years, ISPA.DE has underperformed XDEM.DE with an annualized return of 9.35%, while XDEM.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 16.73% annualized return.


ISPA.DE

1D
0.26%
1M
0.52%
YTD
14.48%
6M
14.99%
1Y
32.01%
3Y*
20.08%
5Y*
10.97%
10Y*
9.35%

XDEM.DE

1D
1.63%
1M
6.79%
YTD
29.03%
6M
28.98%
1Y
40.31%
3Y*
28.45%
5Y*
15.28%
10Y*
16.73%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISPA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
14.48%19.72%12.97%4.78%-1.91%22.80%-9.12%24.23%-6.97%2.97%
XDEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
29.03%8.09%38.22%8.18%-13.65%24.74%16.54%31.58%0.81%16.07%

Correlation

The correlation between ISPA.DE and XDEM.DE is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2014

0.67

The correlation between ISPA.DE and XDEM.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (1 year) to 0.67 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISPA.DE vs. XDEM.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISPA.DE
ISPA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9696
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISPA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

XDEM.DE
XDEM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XDEM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISPA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) and Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISPA.DEXDEM.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.66

1.40

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.74

4.45

+4.29

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

31.84

16.95

+14.89

ISPA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISPA.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.56, which is higher than the XDEM.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISPA.DE and XDEM.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISPA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISPA.DE drawdown since its inception was -38.90%, which is greater than XDEM.DE's maximum drawdown of -30.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISPA.DE and XDEM.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISPA.DEXDEM.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.90%

-30.94%

-7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.64%

-9.01%

+5.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.09%

-23.51%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.09%

-23.51%

+8.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.90%

-30.94%

-7.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-1.24%

+0.80%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.54%

-7.38%

+2.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

2.37%

-1.37%

Volatility

ISPA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE) (ISPA.DE) is 2.51%, while Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C (XDEM.DE) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that ISPA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XDEM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISPA.DEXDEM.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.51%

6.97%

-4.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.86%

15.01%

-8.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.99%

17.90%

-8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.97%

17.51%

-5.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.71%

18.14%

-3.43%

ISPA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISPA.DE has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than XDEM.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISPA.DE vs. XDEM.DE - Dividend Comparison

ISPA.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.71%, while XDEM.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISPA.DE
iShares STOXX Global Select Dividend 100 UCITS ETF (DE)
3.71%4.52%4.89%5.91%4.87%3.31%4.04%4.02%4.01%5.66%3.64%4.35%
XDEM.DE
Xtrackers MSCI World Momentum Factor UCITS ETF 1C
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISPA.DE and XDEM.DE have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XDEM.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XDEM.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for ISPA.DE.

ISPA.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while XDEM.DE is Momentum. ISPA.DE tracks STOXX® Global Select Dividend 100 index, while XDEM.DE tracks MSCI World Momentum Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and DWS. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for ISPA.DE and 0.25% for XDEM.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISPA.DE and XDEM.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer