PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISP6.L vs. PHSP.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISP6.L vs. PHSP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF (ISP6.L) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISP6.L achieves a 15.45% return, which is significantly higher than PHSP.L's 2.97% return. Over the past 10 years, ISP6.L has underperformed PHSP.L with an annualized return of 11.01%, while PHSP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.46% annualized return.


ISP6.L

1D
1.09%
1M
2.81%
YTD
15.45%
6M
14.84%
1Y
34.21%
3Y*
12.19%
5Y*
6.63%
10Y*
11.01%

PHSP.L

1D
0.46%
1M
1.03%
YTD
2.97%
6M
28.18%
1Y
115.25%
3Y*
41.79%
5Y*
22.23%
10Y*
16.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISP6.L vs. PHSP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISP6.L
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF
15.45%-0.91%8.76%10.98%-6.72%27.86%6.87%17.51%-4.56%3.05%
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
2.97%129.68%22.85%-6.51%15.50%-12.11%40.85%12.57%-3.55%-5.67%

Correlation

The correlation between ISP6.L and PHSP.L is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.09

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2008

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISP6.L vs. PHSP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISP6.L
ISP6.L Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
ISP6.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISP6.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISP6.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
ISP6.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISP6.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

PHSP.L
PHSP.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHSP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISP6.L vs. PHSP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF (ISP6.L) and WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISP6.LPHSP.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.37

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.28

2.96

+2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.98

6.48

+9.51

ISP6.L vs. PHSP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISP6.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.20, which is comparable to the PHSP.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISP6.L and PHSP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISP6.LPHSP.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.20

2.12

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.35

0.67

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.56

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.37

+0.20

Drawdowns

ISP6.L vs. PHSP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISP6.L drawdown since its inception was -39.08%, smaller than the maximum PHSP.L drawdown of -70.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISP6.L and PHSP.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISP6.LPHSP.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-39.08%

-70.01%

+30.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.45%

-38.75%

+32.30%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.26%

-38.75%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.26%

-38.75%

+8.49%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.08%

-38.75%

-0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-33.72%

+33.72%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-40.07%

+32.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.13%

17.73%

-15.60%

Volatility

ISP6.L vs. PHSP.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF (ISP6.L) is 3.96%, while WisdomTree Physical Silver (PHSP.L) has a volatility of 16.28%. This indicates that ISP6.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHSP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISP6.LPHSP.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.96%

16.28%

-12.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.32%

51.17%

-40.85%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.51%

54.02%

-38.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.09%

32.98%

-13.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.45%

29.24%

-8.79%

ISP6.L vs. PHSP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISP6.L has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than PHSP.L's 0.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISP6.L vs. PHSP.L - Dividend Comparison

ISP6.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.02%, while PHSP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISP6.L
iShares S&P SmallCap 600 UCITS ETF
1.02%1.22%1.15%1.08%1.00%0.65%0.94%0.97%0.96%0.78%0.77%0.53%
PHSP.L
WisdomTree Physical Silver
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISP6.L and PHSP.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ISP6.L is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISP6.L is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for PHSP.L.

ISP6.L is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while PHSP.L is Silver. ISP6.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD, while PHSP.L tracks LBMA Silver Price. They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISP6.L and 0.49% for PHSP.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISP6.L and PHSP.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer