ISNQX vs. FQLSX

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

ISNQX (Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio) and FQLSX (Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds. Over the past 5 years, ISNQX returned 9.60%/yr vs 11.02%/yr for FQLSX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. ISNQX charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FQLSX.

Performance

ISNQX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISNQX achieves a 11.58% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 13.40% return.

ISNQX

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 3.91%
• YTD: 11.58%
• 6M: 12.23%
• 1Y: 26.60%
• 3Y*: 19.31%
• 5Y*: 9.60%
• 10Y*: 11.42%

FQLSX

• 1D: -0.59%
• 1M: 3.74%
• YTD: 13.40%
• 6M: 14.76%
• 1Y: 29.91%
• 3Y*: 21.76%
• 5Y*: 11.02%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISNQX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	11.58%	20.04%	15.16%	20.86%	-19.16%	17.44%	16.39%	24.65%	-10.36%	10.58%
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	13.40%	22.80%	18.08%	21.04%	-18.58%	16.89%	18.43%	25.96%	-8.31%	10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ISNQX and FQLSX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.93
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.95
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 16, 2017	0.96

The correlation between ISNQX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ISNQX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISNQX

ISNQX Risk / Return Rank: 75
ISNQX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
ISNQX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
ISNQX Omega Ratio Rank: 71
ISNQX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
ISNQX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

FQLSX

FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 69
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 79

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISNQX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ISNQX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.47	2.45	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.55	3.39	+0.16
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.46	1.45	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.16	3.25	-0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.25	14.35	+0.90
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ISNQX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISNQX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.45. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISNQX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ISNQX	FQLSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.47	2.45	+0.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.64	0.73	-0.09
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.71	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.77	0.77	-0.01

Drawdowns

ISNQX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISNQX drawdown since its inception was -33.88%, which is greater than FQLSX's maximum drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISNQX and FQLSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISNQX	FQLSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-33.88%	-31.26%	-2.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.38%	-9.48%	+0.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-15.79%	-15.37%	-0.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.90%	-27.41%	+0.51%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.88%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-0.59%	-0.21%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.59%	-5.43%	+0.84%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.88%	2.14%	-0.26%

Volatility

ISNQX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio (ISNQX) is 3.51%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.15%. This indicates that ISNQX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISNQX	FQLSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.51%	4.15%	-0.64%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.78%	10.31%	-0.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.00%	12.55%	-0.55%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	15.31%	15.12%	+0.19%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.31%	16.08%	+0.23%

ISNQX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISNQX has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

ISNQX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

ISNQX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.18%, more than FQLSX's 4.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FQLSX Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund	4.61%	3.32%	7.20%	2.08%	5.79%	8.05%	5.76%	7.02%	8.18%	3.10%	0.00%	0.00%
ISNQX Voya Solution 2050 Portfolio	7.18%	8.01%	1.33%	6.04%	31.37%	2.78%	6.32%	8.18%	6.96%	1.98%	1.14%	7.90%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISNQX and FQLSX in my portfolio?

ISNQX and FQLSX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISNQX or FQLSX?

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.15%) compared to ISNQX (3.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISNQX dropped -33.88% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISNQX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.