PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISNLX vs. FQLSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISNLX vs. FQLSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Solution 2040 Portfolio (ISNLX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISNLX achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly lower than FQLSX's 12.26% return.


ISNLX

1D
1.65%
1M
-0.66%
6M
5.35%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
18.48%
3Y*
14.82%
5Y*
7.99%
10Y*
10.32%
ALL TIME*
11.00%

FQLSX

1D
2.33%
1M
-1.01%
6M
8.35%
YTD
12.26%
1Y
24.67%
3Y*
18.99%
5Y*
10.72%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

ISNLX vs. FQLSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISNLX
Voya Solution 2040 Portfolio
8.73%18.31%13.52%19.56%-18.86%16.36%16.59%23.35%-8.94%9.37%
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
12.26%22.80%18.08%21.04%-18.58%16.89%18.43%25.96%-8.31%10.12%

Correlation

The correlation between ISNLX and FQLSX is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 15, 2017

0.96

The correlation between ISNLX and FQLSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISNLX vs. FQLSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ISNLX
ISNLX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
ISNLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISNLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISNLX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
ISNLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISNLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

FQLSX
FQLSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FQLSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FQLSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FQLSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FQLSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FQLSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ISNLX vs. FQLSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Solution 2040 Portfolio (ISNLX) and Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISNLXFQLSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.30

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.42

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.92

10.10

-0.19

ISNLX vs. FQLSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISNLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is comparable to the FQLSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.62. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISNLX and FQLSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISNLX vs. FQLSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISNLX drawdown since its inception was -32.03%, roughly equal to the maximum FQLSX drawdown of -31.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISNLX and FQLSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISNLXFQLSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.03%

-31.26%

-0.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.31%

-9.48%

+1.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.66%

-15.37%

+1.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.97%

-27.41%

+1.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-32.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.89%

-2.17%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.28%

-5.36%

+1.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.81%

2.27%

-0.46%

Volatility

ISNLX vs. FQLSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Solution 2040 Portfolio (ISNLX) is 3.31%, while Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund (FQLSX) has a volatility of 4.40%. This indicates that ISNLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FQLSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISNLXFQLSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.31%

4.40%

-1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.36%

12.17%

-2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.56%

14.19%

-2.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.93%

15.36%

-1.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.90%

16.12%

-1.22%

ISNLX vs. FQLSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISNLX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is higher than FQLSX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

ISNLX vs. FQLSX - Dividend Comparison

ISNLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.97%, more than FQLSX's 4.66% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FQLSX
Fidelity Flex Freedom Blend 2055 Fund
4.66%3.32%7.20%2.08%5.79%8.05%5.76%7.02%8.18%3.10%0.00%0.00%
ISNLX
Voya Solution 2040 Portfolio
4.97%5.41%1.55%6.03%29.46%2.62%6.52%8.29%9.93%2.27%1.34%7.70%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISNLX and FQLSX have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FQLSX has higher volatility (4.40%) compared to ISNLX (3.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISNLX dropped -32.03% vs FQLSX's -31.26%.

FQLSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.62 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISNLX and FQLSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer