PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISNGX vs. FFFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISNGX vs. FFFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Solution 2030 Portfolio (ISNGX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISNGX achieves a 7.41% return, which is significantly higher than FFFAX's 4.69% return. Over the past 10 years, ISNGX has outperformed FFFAX with an annualized return of 8.77%, while FFFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.52% annualized return.


ISNGX

1D
-0.57%
1M
2.51%
YTD
7.41%
6M
7.74%
1Y
17.81%
3Y*
13.69%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
8.77%

FFFAX

1D
-0.25%
1M
1.12%
YTD
4.69%
6M
5.09%
1Y
10.77%
3Y*
7.99%
5Y*
3.14%
10Y*
4.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISNGX vs. FFFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISNGX
Voya Solution 2030 Portfolio
7.41%14.59%10.56%15.86%-17.50%12.81%14.64%20.59%-6.96%17.87%
FFFAX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund
4.69%10.42%4.34%8.18%-11.33%3.12%8.93%10.74%-1.99%8.21%

Correlation

The correlation between ISNGX and FFFAX is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.77

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011

0.78

The correlation between ISNGX and FFFAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.76 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISNGX vs. FFFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISNGX
ISNGX Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
ISNGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISNGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISNGX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
ISNGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISNGX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

FFFAX
FFFAX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
FFFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
FFFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISNGX vs. FFFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Solution 2030 Portfolio (ISNGX) and Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISNGXFFFAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.07

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.50

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.07

3.08

-0.01

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.66

13.55

+1.11

ISNGX vs. FFFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISNGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.47, which is comparable to the FFFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISNGX and FFFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISNGXFFFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.47

2.48

-0.01

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

0.59

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.74

0.98

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.05

-0.23

Drawdowns

ISNGX vs. FFFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISNGX drawdown since its inception was -27.75%, which is greater than FFFAX's maximum drawdown of -17.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISNGX and FFFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISNGXFFFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.75%

-17.96%

-9.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.52%

-3.68%

-2.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.92%

-4.91%

-5.01%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.30%

-15.87%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-27.75%

-15.87%

-11.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.25%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.72%

-1.79%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.32%

0.83%

+0.49%

Volatility

ISNGX vs. FFFAX - Volatility Comparison

Voya Solution 2030 Portfolio (ISNGX) has a higher volatility of 2.65% compared to Fidelity Freedom Income Fund (FFFAX) at 1.87%. This indicates that ISNGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISNGXFFFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.65%

1.87%

+0.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.66%

3.85%

+2.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.09%

4.57%

+3.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.84%

5.37%

+5.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.97%

4.64%

+7.33%

ISNGX vs. FFFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISNGX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FFFAX's 0.47% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISNGX vs. FFFAX - Dividend Comparison

ISNGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, more than FFFAX's 2.98% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFFAX
Fidelity Freedom Income Fund
2.98%3.29%3.13%2.92%5.89%6.12%4.37%3.65%5.17%3.74%3.21%3.28%
ISNGX
Voya Solution 2030 Portfolio
4.34%4.66%1.93%4.47%24.73%2.71%5.51%7.92%8.00%2.37%0.77%5.93%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISNGX and FFFAX have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISNGX has higher volatility (2.65%) compared to FFFAX (1.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISNGX dropped -27.75% vs FFFAX's -17.96%.

FFFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 2.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISNGX and FFFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer