PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISMF vs. WTMF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISMF vs. WTMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISMF achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly lower than WTMF's 8.10% return.


ISMF

1D
0.95%
1M
1.14%
6M
3.81%
YTD
6.88%
1Y
20.45%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.55%

WTMF

1D
-0.05%
1M
0.96%
6M
8.70%
YTD
8.10%
1Y
18.77%
3Y*
9.32%
5Y*
6.09%
10Y*
3.47%
ALL TIME*
1.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$215.88K$190.10K$233.30K
$1.17M$1.17M$1.11M

ISMF vs. WTMF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ISMF and WTMF is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 13, 2025

0.38

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISMF vs. WTMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ISMF
ISMF Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
ISMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISMF Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
ISMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

WTMF
WTMF Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
WTMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTMF Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
WTMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTMF Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ISMF vs. WTMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) and WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISMFWTMFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.37

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.14

4.38

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.58

16.87

-1.29

ISMF vs. WTMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISMF Sharpe Ratio is 2.50, which is comparable to the WTMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISMF and WTMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISMF vs. WTMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISMF drawdown since its inception was -4.23%, smaller than the maximum WTMF drawdown of -30.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISMF and WTMF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISMFWTMFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.23%

-30.79%

+26.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.94%

-4.04%

+0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-9.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.83%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.87%

-0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.31%

-17.53%

+16.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.30%

1.05%

+0.25%

Volatility

ISMF vs. WTMF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Managed Futures Active ETF (ISMF) is 1.93%, while WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund (WTMF) has a volatility of 2.19%. This indicates that ISMF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WTMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISMFWTMFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.93%

2.19%

-0.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.93%

7.17%

-1.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.10%

9.13%

-1.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.63%

9.37%

-1.74%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

7.63%

8.12%

-0.49%

ISMF vs. WTMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISMF has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than WTMF's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISMF vs. WTMF - Dividend Comparison

ISMF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, more than WTMF's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ISMF
iShares Managed Futures Active ETF
5.83%6.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WTMF
WisdomTree Managed Futures Strategy Fund
2.82%3.04%3.57%4.74%5.29%14.71%0.47%1.63%3.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISMF and WTMF have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WTMF has higher volatility (2.19%) compared to ISMF (1.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISMF dropped -4.23% vs WTMF's -30.79%.

On 1-year performance, ISMF leads with 20.45% vs 18.77% for WTMF. On fees, WTMF is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, ISMF has been the lower-risk option at 1.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, ISMF has performed better with a 20.45% return vs 18.77%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

WTMF is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for ISMF.

ISMF has the higher dividend yield at 5.83%, compared with 2.82% for WTMF.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for ISMF and 0.65% for WTMF.

ISMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.50 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISMF and WTMF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer