ISLN.L vs. XGDU.L
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L).
ISLN.L and XGDU.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. ISLN.L is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the LBMA Silver Price. It was launched on Apr 8, 2011. XGDU.L is a passively managed fund by Xtrackers that tracks the performance of the Gold. It was launched on Apr 22, 2020. Both ISLN.L and XGDU.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
ISLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ISLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISLN.L iShares Physical Silver ETC | 5.49% | 147.59% | 21.12% | -0.77% | 3.39% | -12.85% | 73.13% |
XGDU.L Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities | 10.77% | 64.71% | 26.20% | 13.45% | 0.32% | -3.91% | 9.83% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISLN.L achieves a 5.49% return, which is significantly lower than XGDU.L's 10.77% return.
ISLN.L
- 1D
- 2.47%
- 1M
- -13.65%
- YTD
- 5.49%
- 6M
- 59.59%
- 1Y
- 123.18%
- 3Y*
- 46.20%
- 5Y*
- 24.78%
- 10Y*
- 17.35%
XGDU.L
- 1D
- 3.30%
- 1M
- -10.14%
- YTD
- 10.77%
- 6M
- 23.43%
- 1Y
- 52.46%
- 3Y*
- 33.96%
- 5Y*
- 22.38%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISLN.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XGDU.L's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
ISLN.L vs. XGDU.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISLN.L
XGDU.L
ISLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) and Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISLN.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.27 | 1.99 | +0.28 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.51 | 2.46 | +0.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.36 | +0.05 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.00 | 2.99 | +0.01 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.35 | 11.35 | -2.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISLN.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.27 | 1.99 | +0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 | 1.32 | -0.60 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.57 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.13 | 1.12 | -0.99 |
Correlation
The correlation between ISLN.L and XGDU.L is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
ISLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISLN.L nor XGDU.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
ISLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISLN.L drawdown since its inception was -76.63%, which is greater than XGDU.L's maximum drawdown of -21.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISLN.L and XGDU.L.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISLN.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -76.63% | -21.59% | -55.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -40.67% | -17.47% | -23.20% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.67% | -21.00% | -19.67% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.60% | -10.14% | -23.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -54.53% | -7.16% | -47.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 13.06% | 4.61% | +8.45% |
Volatility
ISLN.L vs. XGDU.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares Physical Silver ETC (ISLN.L) has a higher volatility of 18.13% compared to Xtrackers IE Physical Gold ETC Securities (XGDU.L) at 11.38%. This indicates that ISLN.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XGDU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ISLN.L | XGDU.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.13% | 11.38% | +6.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 51.85% | 22.32% | +29.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.87% | 26.24% | +27.63% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.27% | 17.03% | +17.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.26% | 17.19% | +13.07% |