PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISJP.L vs. LGJG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with ISJP.L having a 15.08% return and LGJG.L slightly lower at 14.69%.


ISJP.L

1D
0.31%
1M
4.30%
YTD
15.08%
6M
15.70%
1Y
31.91%
3Y*
14.99%
5Y*
8.64%
10Y*
8.58%

LGJG.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.81%
YTD
14.69%
6M
14.33%
1Y
32.99%
3Y*
15.35%
5Y*
10.06%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ISJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)
15.08%20.89%4.99%7.01%-2.01%-2.01%4.51%10.57%
LGJG.L
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF
14.69%17.46%10.01%13.64%-6.84%1.78%13.24%11.39%

Correlation

The correlation between ISJP.L and LGJG.L is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 8, 2019

0.83

The correlation between ISJP.L and LGJG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISJP.L vs. LGJG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISJP.L
ISJP.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
ISJP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISJP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISJP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
ISJP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISJP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

LGJG.L
LGJG.L Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
LGJG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
LGJG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISJP.L) and L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISJP.LLGJG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.25

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.34

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.89

2.86

+0.03

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.66

9.27

+0.40

ISJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISJP.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the LGJG.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISJP.L and LGJG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISJP.LLGJG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.07

1.79

+0.27

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

0.65

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.64

-0.16

Drawdowns

ISJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISJP.L drawdown since its inception was -32.93%, which is greater than LGJG.L's maximum drawdown of -22.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISJP.L and LGJG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISJP.LLGJG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.93%

-22.92%

-10.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.84%

-11.04%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.23%

-13.84%

+2.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.01%

-18.20%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.25%

-0.18%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-5.15%

-1.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

3.42%

-0.17%

Volatility

ISJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist) (ISJP.L) has a higher volatility of 4.25% compared to L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF (LGJG.L) at 3.71%. This indicates that ISJP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LGJG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISJP.LLGJG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.25%

3.71%

+0.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.34%

14.24%

-0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

17.63%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.22%

15.58%

-1.36%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.62%

16.81%

-1.19%

ISJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISJP.L has a 0.58% expense ratio, which is higher than LGJG.L's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISJP.L vs. LGJG.L - Dividend Comparison

ISJP.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.67%, while LGJG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISJP.L
iShares MSCI Japan Small Cap UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.67%1.85%1.73%1.77%1.99%1.52%1.58%1.53%1.39%1.29%1.07%0.68%
LGJG.L
L&G Japan Equity UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISJP.L and LGJG.L have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, LGJG.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

LGJG.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.58% for ISJP.L.

ISJP.L tracks MSCI Japan Small Cap NR JPY, while LGJG.L tracks TOPIX TR JPY. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.58% for ISJP.L and 0.10% for LGJG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISJP.L and LGJG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer