ISIF.TO vs. PYF.TO
ISIF.TO (IA Clarington Strategic Income Fund) and PYF.TO (Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISIF.TO returned 7.01%/yr vs 6.00%/yr for PYF.TO. At a 0.05 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISIF.TO charges 0.94%/yr vs 0.78%/yr for PYF.TO.
Performance
ISIF.TO vs. PYF.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISIF.TO achieves a 6.17% return, which is significantly higher than PYF.TO's 2.39% return.
ISIF.TO
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- 6M
- 5.28%
- YTD
- 6.17%
- 1Y
- 10.95%
- 3Y*
- 11.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.01%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 7.42%
PYF.TO
- 1D
- 0.24%
- 1M
- 0.91%
- 6M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 3.22%
- 3Y*
- 6.37%
- 5Y*
- 6.00%
- 10Y*
- 4.61%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.66%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| CA$409.30 | CA$5.79K | CA$2.57K | |
| CA$132.75K | CA$156.88K | CA$433.79K |
ISIF.TO vs. PYF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISIF.TO IA Clarington Strategic Income Fund | 6.17% | 12.42% | 11.91% | 6.17% | -5.63% | 17.60% | 0.18% | 2.55% |
PYF.TO Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF | 2.39% | 5.45% | 7.42% | 8.40% | 5.25% | 4.95% | -1.59% | 0.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISIF.TO and PYF.TO is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2019 | 0.05 |
The correlation between ISIF.TO and PYF.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.05 (1 year) to 0.07 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISIF.TO vs. PYF.TO — Risk / Return Rank
ISIF.TO
PYF.TO
ISIF.TO vs. PYF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IA Clarington Strategic Income Fund (ISIF.TO) and Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISIF.TO | PYF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.56 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.19 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.49 | 1.53 | +0.96 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.30 | 4.07 | +6.23 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISIF.TO vs. PYF.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISIF.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.65%, smaller than the maximum PYF.TO drawdown of -20.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISIF.TO and PYF.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISIF.TO | PYF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.65% | -20.53% | +1.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.64% | -2.11% | -2.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.40% | -5.57% | -2.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.47% | -5.57% | -5.90% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.53% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.58% | -0.06% | -0.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.04% | -0.97% | -2.07% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.12% | 0.79% | +0.33% |
Volatility
ISIF.TO vs. PYF.TO - Volatility Comparison
IA Clarington Strategic Income Fund (ISIF.TO) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF (PYF.TO) at 1.11%. This indicates that ISIF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PYF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISIF.TO | PYF.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.06% | 1.11% | +3.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.64% | 2.81% | +3.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.48% | 3.28% | +4.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 9.60% | 5.26% | +4.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.25% | 6.67% | +3.58% |
ISIF.TO vs. PYF.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISIF.TO has a 0.94% expense ratio, which is higher than PYF.TO's 0.78% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISIF.TO vs. PYF.TO - Dividend Comparison
ISIF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, less than PYF.TO's 7.19% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISIF.TO IA Clarington Strategic Income Fund | 2.78% | 2.83% | 2.85% | 2.58% | 2.98% | 1.59% | 2.68% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PYF.TO Purpose Premium Yield Fund Series ETF | 7.19% | 7.84% | 7.66% | 7.47% | 5.78% | 5.74% | 5.69% | 5.29% | 5.38% | 5.83% | 6.59% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISIF.TO and PYF.TO have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, PYF.TO is cheaper at 0.78% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
PYF.TO is cheaper with a 0.78% expense ratio, compared with 0.94% for ISIF.TO.
They also come from different issuers: IA Clarington Investments Inc. and Purpose Investments. Their fees differ too: 0.94% for ISIF.TO and 0.78% for PYF.TO.
Find the right allocation for ISIF.TO and PYF.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer