ISHIX vs. QILGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Fund (ISHIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX).
ISHIX is managed by Federated. It was launched on May 20, 1987. QILGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 15, 2005.
Performance
ISHIX vs. QILGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
ISHIX vs. QILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHIX Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Fund | -1.10% | 6.94% | 2.06% | 7.72% | -14.64% | -0.07% | 8.83% | 13.86% | -2.94% | 6.63% |
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | -9.18% | 19.46% | 40.83% | 39.63% | -24.86% | 30.46% | 38.39% | 32.01% | 1.52% | 25.42% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISHIX achieves a -1.10% return, which is significantly higher than QILGX's -9.18% return. Over the past 10 years, ISHIX has underperformed QILGX with an annualized return of 2.90%, while QILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.94% annualized return.
ISHIX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -2.02%
- YTD
- -1.10%
- 6M
- -0.26%
- 1Y
- 4.02%
- 3Y*
- 3.96%
- 5Y*
- 0.49%
- 10Y*
- 2.90%
QILGX
- 1D
- 3.69%
- 1M
- -4.55%
- YTD
- -9.18%
- 6M
- -6.82%
- 1Y
- 18.03%
- 3Y*
- 23.36%
- 5Y*
- 15.35%
- 10Y*
- 17.94%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
ISHIX vs. QILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISHIX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than QILGX's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
ISHIX vs. QILGX — Risk / Return Rank
ISHIX
QILGX
ISHIX vs. QILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Fund (ISHIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISHIX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.11 | 0.91 | +0.20 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.37 | +0.16 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.22 | +0.02 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.16 | +0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.88 | 3.79 | +2.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISHIX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.11 | 0.91 | +0.20 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.08 | 0.73 | -0.65 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | 0.85 | -0.28 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.22 | 0.56 | +0.66 |
Correlation
The correlation between ISHIX and QILGX is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
ISHIX vs. QILGX - Dividend Comparison
ISHIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.74%, more than QILGX's 3.41% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISHIX Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Fund | 3.74% | 3.34% | 3.26% | 3.45% | 3.63% | 3.16% | 3.15% | 3.62% | 3.72% | 3.92% | 4.12% | 5.59% |
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund | 3.41% | 3.09% | 6.60% | 1.47% | 13.57% | 19.44% | 7.47% | 5.07% | 10.33% | 7.40% | 0.55% | 11.76% |
Drawdowns
ISHIX vs. QILGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISHIX drawdown since its inception was -21.10%, smaller than the maximum QILGX drawdown of -53.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHIX and QILGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISHIX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.10% | -53.48% | +32.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.82% | -15.55% | +12.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.00% | -30.05% | +10.05% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.00% | -31.68% | +11.68% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.36% | -12.44% | +10.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.68% | -9.01% | +6.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.77% | 4.75% | -3.98% |
Volatility
ISHIX vs. QILGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Corporate Bond Fund (ISHIX) is 1.69%, while Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) has a volatility of 6.81%. This indicates that ISHIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| ISHIX | QILGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.69% | 6.81% | -5.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.45% | 13.44% | -10.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.21% | 19.96% | -15.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 21.04% | -15.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.15% | 21.22% | -16.07% |