PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISHG vs. GLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISHG vs. GLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISHG achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly higher than GLD's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, ISHG has underperformed GLD with an annualized return of -0.14%, while GLD has yielded a comparatively higher 12.15% annualized return.


ISHG

1D
0.06%
1M
-0.91%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
0.19%
1Y
0.99%
3Y*
4.08%
5Y*
-1.07%
10Y*
-0.14%

GLD

1D
0.06%
1M
-10.21%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-2.25%
1Y
23.81%
3Y*
28.89%
5Y*
17.08%
10Y*
12.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISHG vs. GLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISHG
iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF
-0.18%13.31%-4.16%3.76%-10.95%-7.05%7.47%-0.64%-3.54%10.91%
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
-2.47%63.68%26.66%12.69%-0.77%-4.15%24.81%17.86%-1.94%12.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ISHG and GLD is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 28, 2009

0.42

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISHG vs. GLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISHG
ISHG Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
ISHG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISHG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISHG Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
ISHG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISHG Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

GLD
GLD Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
GLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
GLD Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
GLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
GLD Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISHG vs. GLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG) and SPDR Gold Shares (GLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISHGGLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.96

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.18

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

0.98

-0.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.49

2.81

-2.32

ISHG vs. GLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISHG Sharpe Ratio is 0.15, which is lower than the GLD Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISHG and GLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISHG vs. GLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISHG drawdown since its inception was -37.24%, smaller than the maximum GLD drawdown of -45.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISHG and GLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISHGGLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.24%

-45.56%

+8.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.02%

-24.46%

+19.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.21%

-24.46%

+16.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.55%

-24.46%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.56%

-24.46%

-1.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-22.37%

-22.05%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.44%

-16.16%

-2.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

8.49%

-6.44%

Volatility

ISHG vs. GLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF (ISHG) is 1.67%, while SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) has a volatility of 7.79%. This indicates that ISHG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISHGGLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.67%

7.79%

-6.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.76%

24.10%

-19.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.51%

27.37%

-20.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.58%

18.22%

-10.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.94%

16.08%

-9.14%

ISHG vs. GLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISHG has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than GLD's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISHG vs. GLD - Dividend Comparison

ISHG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.45%, while GLD has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GLD
SPDR Gold Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISHG
iShares 1-3 Year International Treasury Bond ETF
1.45%1.45%2.56%0.18%0.00%1.29%0.00%0.00%1.80%0.46%0.00%0.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISHG and GLD have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GLD has higher volatility (7.79%) compared to ISHG (1.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISHG dropped -37.24% vs GLD's -45.56%.

On 10-year performance, GLD leads with 12.15% vs -0.14% for ISHG. On fees, ISHG is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, ISHG has been the lower-risk option at 1.67%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, GLD has performed better with a 12.15% return vs -0.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISHG is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for GLD.

ISHG has the higher dividend yield at 1.45%, compared with 0.00% for GLD.

ISHG is categorized as International Government Bonds, while GLD is Gold. ISHG tracks S&P/Citigroup International Treasury Bond Index Ex-US 1-3 Year, while GLD tracks LBMA Gold Price PM. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for ISHG and 0.40% for GLD.

GLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.87 vs 0.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISHG and GLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer