ISFIX vs. PAGRX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

ISFIX (VY Columbia Contrarian Core Portfolio) and PAGRX (Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, ISFIX returned 18.99%/yr vs 19.57%/yr for PAGRX. Their correlation of 0.89 means they have usually moved in the same direction. ISFIX charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.10%/yr for PAGRX.

Performance

ISFIX vs. PAGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VY Columbia Contrarian Core Portfolio (ISFIX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I (PAGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISFIX achieves a 9.81% return, which is significantly higher than PAGRX's 7.08% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with ISFIX having a 18.99% annualized return and PAGRX not far ahead at 19.57%.

ISFIX

• 1D: 0.94%
• 1M: 0.54%
• 6M: 8.87%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 1Y: 17.03%
• 3Y*: 19.09%
• 5Y*: 12.53%
• 10Y*: 18.99%
• ALL TIME*: 10.99%

PAGRX

• 1D: 0.16%
• 1M: -2.99%
• 6M: 3.20%
• YTD: 7.08%
• 1Y: 24.84%
• 3Y*: 31.50%
• 5Y*: 17.57%
• 10Y*: 19.57%
• ALL TIME*: 12.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ISFIX VY Columbia Contrarian Core Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

ISFIX vs. PAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISFIX VY Columbia Contrarian Core Portfolio	9.81%	17.39%	23.33%	31.94%	-18.25%	24.31%	21.81%	91.56%	-8.72%	21.97%
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I	7.08%	36.92%	44.52%	38.73%	-26.06%	24.84%	37.65%	40.34%	-12.41%	21.19%

Correlation

The correlation between ISFIX and PAGRX is 0.73, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.73
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.76
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.83
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2001	0.89

The correlation between ISFIX and PAGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.73 (1 year) to 0.89 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

ISFIX vs. PAGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ISFIX

ISFIX Risk / Return Rank: 42
ISFIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 43
ISFIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
ISFIX Omega Ratio Rank: 40
ISFIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 42
ISFIX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

PAGRX

PAGRX Risk / Return Rank: 45
PAGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
PAGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
PAGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 34
PAGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
PAGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 46

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ISFIX vs. PAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VY Columbia Contrarian Core Portfolio (ISFIX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I (PAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISFIX	PAGRX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.37	1.22	+0.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	1.73	+0.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.22	+0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.84	2.41	-0.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.98	7.01	-0.03

ISFIX vs. PAGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISFIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.37, which is comparable to the PAGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISFIX and PAGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISFIX vs. PAGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISFIX drawdown since its inception was -57.61%, roughly equal to the maximum PAGRX drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISFIX and PAGRX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISFIX	PAGRX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.61%	-55.87%	-1.74%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.06%	-9.16%	-0.90%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.18%	-26.34%	+6.16%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-24.00%	-36.52%	+12.52%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-32.51%	-38.01%	+5.50%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.02%	-7.95%	+6.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.09%	-10.03%	+1.94%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.56%	3.15%	-0.59%

Volatility

ISFIX vs. PAGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VY Columbia Contrarian Core Portfolio (ISFIX) is 3.85%, while Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I (PAGRX) has a volatility of 4.11%. This indicates that ISFIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISFIX	PAGRX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.85%	4.11%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.48%	13.88%	-3.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.54%	18.11%	-4.57%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.66%	24.53%	-6.87%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.95%	24.48%	-1.53%

ISFIX vs. PAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISFIX has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGRX's 1.10% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISFIX vs. PAGRX - Dividend Comparison

ISFIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.29%, more than PAGRX's 0.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISFIX VY Columbia Contrarian Core Portfolio	7.29%	8.00%	2.11%	43.85%	20.76%	11.30%	2.65%	77.40%	13.78%	6.74%	13.24%	13.56%
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio Class I	0.03%	0.03%	5.62%	2.72%	7.79%	6.82%	15.08%	17.51%	12.33%	8.70%	16.94%	6.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISFIX and PAGRX in my portfolio?

ISFIX and PAGRX have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISFIX or PAGRX?

PAGRX has higher volatility (4.11%) compared to ISFIX (3.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISFIX dropped -57.61% vs PAGRX's -55.87%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISFIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.37 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.