ISEP vs. PAPR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ISEP (Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - September) and PAPR (Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. ISEP is actively managed, while PAPR is passively managed. Over the past year, ISEP returned 13.86% vs 13.78% for PAPR. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISEP charges 0.85%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for PAPR.

Performance

ISEP vs. PAPR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - September (ISEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISEP achieves a 5.43% return, which is significantly lower than PAPR's 7.23% return.

ISEP

• 1D: -0.83%
• 1M: 0.66%
• YTD: 5.43%
• 6M: 5.35%
• 1Y: 13.86%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PAPR

• 1D: -0.36%
• 1M: -0.14%
• YTD: 7.23%
• 6M: 7.25%
• 1Y: 13.78%
• 3Y*: 11.12%
• 5Y*: 8.08%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISEP vs. PAPR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
ISEP Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - September	5.43%	18.29%	5.41%	4.02%
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April	7.23%	6.58%	12.28%	4.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ISEP and PAPR is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.69
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 1, 2023	0.65

The correlation between ISEP and PAPR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ISEP vs. PAPR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISEP

ISEP Risk / Return Rank: 53
ISEP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
ISEP Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
ISEP Omega Ratio Rank: 50
ISEP Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
ISEP Martin Ratio Rank: 57

PAPR

PAPR Risk / Return Rank: 98
PAPR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
PAPR Sortino Ratio Rank: 98
PAPR Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PAPR Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
PAPR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISEP vs. PAPR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - September (ISEP) and Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISEP	PAPR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.57	4.05	-2.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.31	7.03	-4.72
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.96	-0.68
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.54	11.92	-9.38
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.13	61.40	-52.27

ISEP vs. PAPR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISEP Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is lower than the PAPR Sharpe Ratio of 4.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISEP and PAPR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISEP vs. PAPR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISEP drawdown since its inception was -7.36%, smaller than the maximum PAPR drawdown of -15.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISEP and PAPR.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISEP	PAPR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.36%	-15.31%	+7.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-5.48%	-1.16%	-4.32%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-11.87%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-11.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.83%	-0.66%	-0.17%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.53%	-1.56%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.52%	0.22%	+1.30%

Volatility

ISEP vs. PAPR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - September (ISEP) has a higher volatility of 2.40% compared to Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April (PAPR) at 1.45%. This indicates that ISEP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PAPR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISEP	PAPR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.40%	1.45%	+0.95%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.49%	2.78%	+3.71%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.88%	3.44%	+5.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.53%	8.22%	+1.31%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.53%	9.42%	+0.11%

ISEP vs. PAPR - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISEP has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than PAPR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISEP vs. PAPR - Dividend Comparison

Neither ISEP nor PAPR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ISEP Innovator International Developed Power Buffer ETF - September	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
PAPR Innovator U.S. Equity Power Buffer ETF - April	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	3.07%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISEP and PAPR in my portfolio?

ISEP and PAPR have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISEP or PAPR?

ISEP has higher volatility (2.40%) compared to PAPR (1.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISEP dropped -7.36% vs PAPR's -15.31%.

Which ETF is better, ISEP or PAPR?

On 1-year performance, ISEP leads with 13.86% vs 13.78% for PAPR. On fees, PAPR is cheaper at 0.79% per year. On volatility, PAPR has been the lower-risk option at 1.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISEP or PAPR?

Over the 1-year period, ISEP has performed better with a 13.86% return vs 13.78%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISEP or PAPR?

PAPR is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for ISEP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISEP or PAPR?

ISEP and PAPR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between ISEP and PAPR?

Their fees differ too: 0.85% for ISEP and 0.79% for PAPR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PAPR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.05 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.