PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISEM.L vs. QQQY.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISEM.L vs. QQQY.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP (ISEM.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISEM.L is traded in GBp, while QQQY.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the QQQY.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period


ISEM.L

1D
-1.88%
1M
20.31%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QQQY.L

1D
-0.85%
1M
6.80%
YTD
15.53%
6M
14.04%
1Y
32.42%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISEM.L vs. QQQY.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between ISEM.L and QQQY.L is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026

0.58

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISEM.L vs. QQQY.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISEM.L

QQQY.L
QQQY.L Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
QQQY.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQY.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISEM.L vs. QQQY.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP (ISEM.L) and IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP (QQQY.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

ISEM.L vs. QQQY.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISEM.LQQQY.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

25.95

0.96

+25.00

Drawdowns

ISEM.L vs. QQQY.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISEM.L drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum QQQY.L drawdown of -22.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISEM.L and QQQY.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISEM.LQQQY.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.35%

-22.90%

+16.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.88%

-0.85%

-1.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.98%

-5.03%

+4.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.10%

Volatility

ISEM.L vs. QQQY.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISEM.LQQQY.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

41.02%

15.28%

+25.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.02%

21.26%

+19.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.02%

21.26%

+19.76%

ISEM.L vs. QQQY.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ISEM.L and QQQY.L have an expense ratio of 0.45%.


Dividends

ISEM.L vs. QQQY.L - Dividend Comparison

ISEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.10%, less than QQQY.L's 67.73% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
ISEM.L
IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP
14.10%0.00%0.00%
QQQY.L
IncomeShares Nasdaq 100 Options (0DTE) ETP
67.73%120.60%18.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISEM.L and QQQY.L have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.45% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ISEM.L and QQQY.L have the same expense ratio: 0.45% per year.

ISEM.L is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQQY.L is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: IncomeShares and Leverage Shares.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISEM.L and QQQY.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer