ISEM.L vs. GOOO.L
ISEM.L (IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP) and GOOO.L (IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP) are both Derivative Income funds. ISEM.L is passively managed, while GOOO.L is actively managed. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISEM.L charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for GOOO.L.
Performance
ISEM.L vs. GOOO.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
ISEM.L
- 1D
- 2.92%
- 1M
- 29.69%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GOOO.L
- 1D
- -2.33%
- 1M
- -4.91%
- YTD
- 6.47%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- 1Y
- 71.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ISEM.L vs. GOOO.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
ISEM.L IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP | 57.70% |
GOOO.L IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP | 12.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISEM.L and GOOO.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2026 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISEM.L vs. GOOO.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISEM.L
GOOO.L
ISEM.L vs. GOOO.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP (ISEM.L) and IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP (GOOO.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISEM.L | GOOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 3.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 31.14 | 1.66 | +29.48 |
Drawdowns
ISEM.L vs. GOOO.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISEM.L drawdown since its inception was -6.35%, smaller than the maximum GOOO.L drawdown of -28.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISEM.L and GOOO.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISEM.L | GOOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.35% | -28.28% | +21.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.85% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -10.30% | +10.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.96% | -7.48% | +6.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.30% | — |
Volatility
ISEM.L vs. GOOO.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISEM.L | GOOO.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.91% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.66% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 40.89% | 23.78% | +17.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 40.89% | 25.27% | +15.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.89% | 25.27% | +15.62% |
ISEM.L vs. GOOO.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISEM.L has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than GOOO.L's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISEM.L vs. GOOO.L - Dividend Comparison
ISEM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.84%, less than GOOO.L's 22.91% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
GOOO.L IncomeShares Alphabet (GOOG) Options ETP GBP | 22.91% | 11.49% | 1.94% |
ISEM.L IncomeShares Semiconductors Leaders ETP | 13.84% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISEM.L and GOOO.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ISEM.L is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ISEM.L is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for GOOO.L.
They also come from different issuers: IncomeShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for ISEM.L and 0.55% for GOOO.L.
Find the right allocation for ISEM.L and GOOO.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer