ISDU.L vs. HSUS.L
ISDU.L (iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF) and HSUS.L (HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - ISDU.L tracks the MSCI USA Islamic Index while HSUS.L tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISDU.L returned 14.50%/yr vs 12.83%/yr for HSUS.L. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ISDU.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for HSUS.L.
Performance
ISDU.L vs. HSUS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
ISDU.L is traded in USD, while HSUS.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the HSUS.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISDU.L achieves a 23.62% return, which is significantly higher than HSUS.L's 13.69% return.
ISDU.L
- 1D
- 0.83%
- 1M
- 13.22%
- YTD
- 23.62%
- 6M
- 24.88%
- 1Y
- 42.22%
- 3Y*
- 20.40%
- 5Y*
- 14.50%
- 10Y*
- 12.60%
HSUS.L
- 1D
- -0.27%
- 1M
- 7.46%
- YTD
- 13.69%
- 6M
- 15.49%
- 1Y
- 34.92%
- 3Y*
- 21.62%
- 5Y*
- 12.83%
- 10Y*
- —
ISDU.L vs. HSUS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISDU.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF | 23.62% | 16.32% | 9.36% | 25.84% | -11.90% | 29.59% | 9.28% |
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 13.69% | 19.15% | 19.80% | 21.17% | -17.59% | 28.58% | 20.05% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISDU.L and HSUS.L is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 8, 2020 | 0.83 |
The correlation between ISDU.L and HSUS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
ISDU.L vs. HSUS.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Technology
Energy
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Communication Services
Real Estate
Financial Services
-
Technology
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Energy
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Healthcare
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Consumer Cyclical
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Industrials
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Basic Materials
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Consumer Defensive
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Utilities
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Communication Services
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Real Estate
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
Financial Services
ISDU.L
-
HSUS.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISDU.L vs. HSUS.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISDU.L
HSUS.L
ISDU.L vs. HSUS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) and HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ISDU.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.56 | 1.57 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.09 | 4.34 | +1.75 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 20.40 | 17.07 | +3.33 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ISDU.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.24 | 3.23 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 | 0.85 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.78 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.66 | 1.07 | -0.42 |
Drawdowns
ISDU.L vs. HSUS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISDU.L drawdown since its inception was -37.79%, which is greater than HSUS.L's maximum drawdown of -25.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISDU.L and HSUS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISDU.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.79% | -25.41% | -12.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.90% | -8.00% | +1.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.98% | -20.00% | -1.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -25.41% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.01% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.27% | +0.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.20% | -5.22% | +1.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 2.04% | +0.02% |
Volatility
ISDU.L vs. HSUS.L - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) has a higher volatility of 5.02% compared to HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD (HSUS.L) at 2.79%. This indicates that ISDU.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HSUS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISDU.L | HSUS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.02% | 2.79% | +2.23% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.93% | 7.96% | +1.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.05% | 10.82% | +2.23% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.17% | 15.04% | +1.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.18% | 15.37% | +0.81% |
ISDU.L vs. HSUS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISDU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than HSUS.L's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISDU.L vs. HSUS.L - Dividend Comparison
ISDU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, while HSUS.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HSUS.L HSBC USA Sustainable Equity UCITS ETF USD | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISDU.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF | 0.61% | 0.74% | 0.90% | 1.10% | 1.52% | 1.01% | 1.39% | 1.37% | 1.49% | 1.38% | 1.34% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISDU.L and HSUS.L have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HSUS.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HSUS.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISDU.L.
ISDU.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic Index, while HSUS.L tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISDU.L and 0.12% for HSUS.L.
Find the right allocation for ISDU.L and HSUS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer