PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISDU.L vs. EMRD.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISDU.L vs. EMRD.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISDU.L achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly lower than EMRD.L's 18.51% return. Over the past 10 years, ISDU.L has outperformed EMRD.L with an annualized return of 11.44%, while EMRD.L has yielded a comparatively lower 8.95% annualized return.


ISDU.L

1D
-1.63%
1M
-4.25%
6M
14.85%
YTD
17.03%
1Y
30.03%
3Y*
15.79%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
11.44%

EMRD.L

1D
-1.32%
1M
-7.35%
6M
12.75%
YTD
18.51%
1Y
35.69%
3Y*
20.23%
5Y*
6.85%
10Y*
8.95%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISDU.L vs. EMRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISDU.L
iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF
17.03%15.85%9.35%25.84%-11.90%29.59%6.85%20.61%-6.03%14.02%
EMRD.L
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
18.51%34.18%7.65%9.74%-20.67%-2.26%17.96%17.38%-14.07%36.47%

Correlation

The correlation between ISDU.L and EMRD.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.64

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 16, 2011

0.58

The correlation between ISDU.L and EMRD.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISDU.L vs. EMRD.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISDU.L
ISDU.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
ISDU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISDU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

EMRD.L
EMRD.L Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
EMRD.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
EMRD.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISDU.L vs. EMRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ISDU.LEMRD.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.58

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.30

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.34

2.84

+1.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.50

8.72

+3.77

ISDU.L vs. EMRD.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISDU.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.01, which is comparable to the EMRD.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISDU.L and EMRD.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISDU.L vs. EMRD.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISDU.L drawdown since its inception was -44.43%, which is greater than EMRD.L's maximum drawdown of -39.82%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISDU.L and EMRD.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISDU.LEMRD.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-44.43%

-39.82%

-4.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.89%

-12.43%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.98%

-16.71%

-5.27%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.98%

-35.03%

+13.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.00%

-39.82%

+6.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.34%

-9.35%

+4.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.22%

-14.50%

+8.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

4.05%

-1.65%

Volatility

ISDU.L vs. EMRD.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) is 6.11%, while State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (EMRD.L) has a volatility of 9.23%. This indicates that ISDU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EMRD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISDU.LEMRD.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.11%

9.23%

-3.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.38%

19.85%

-7.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.90%

21.97%

-7.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.50%

19.31%

-2.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.28%

19.65%

-3.37%

ISDU.L vs. EMRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISDU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EMRD.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISDU.L vs. EMRD.L - Dividend Comparison

ISDU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, while EMRD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EMRD.L
State Street SPDR MSCI Emerging Markets UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISDU.L
iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF
0.65%0.39%0.90%1.10%1.52%1.01%1.39%1.37%1.49%1.38%1.34%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


ISDU.L and EMRD.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, EMRD.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

EMRD.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISDU.L.

ISDU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EMRD.L is Emerging Markets Equities. ISDU.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic Index, while EMRD.L tracks MSCI Emerging Markets Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISDU.L and 0.18% for EMRD.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISDU.L and EMRD.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer