ISDU.L vs. EEDM.L
ISDU.L (iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF) and EEDM.L (iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - ISDU.L is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA Islamic Index, while EEDM.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISDU.L returned 12.92%/yr vs 6.14%/yr for EEDM.L. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISDU.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for EEDM.L.
Performance
ISDU.L vs. EEDM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISDU.L achieves a 17.03% return, which is significantly lower than EEDM.L's 17.95% return.
ISDU.L
- 1D
- -1.63%
- 1M
- -4.25%
- 6M
- 14.85%
- YTD
- 17.03%
- 1Y
- 30.03%
- 3Y*
- 15.79%
- 5Y*
- 12.92%
- 10Y*
- 11.44%
EEDM.L
- 1D
- -0.97%
- 1M
- -7.35%
- 6M
- 12.82%
- YTD
- 17.95%
- 1Y
- 33.86%
- 3Y*
- 19.43%
- 5Y*
- 6.14%
- 10Y*
- —
ISDU.L vs. EEDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISDU.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF | 17.03% | 15.85% | 9.35% | 25.84% | -11.90% | 29.59% | 6.85% | 7.61% |
EEDM.L iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 17.95% | 35.48% | 6.70% | 8.18% | -21.69% | -2.85% | 19.76% | 7.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISDU.L and EEDM.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 24, 2019 | 0.64 |
The correlation between ISDU.L and EEDM.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (3 years) to 0.73 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISDU.L vs. EEDM.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISDU.L
EEDM.L
ISDU.L vs. EEDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) and iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISDU.L | EEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.29 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.34 | 2.50 | +1.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.50 | 7.99 | +4.51 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISDU.L vs. EEDM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISDU.L drawdown since its inception was -44.43%, which is greater than EEDM.L's maximum drawdown of -40.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISDU.L and EEDM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISDU.L | EEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -44.43% | -40.90% | -3.53% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.89% | -13.41% | +6.52% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.98% | -16.97% | -5.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -36.39% | +14.41% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.34% | -9.31% | +3.97% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.22% | -16.32% | +10.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 4.20% | -1.80% |
Volatility
ISDU.L vs. EEDM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF (ISDU.L) is 6.11%, while iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (EEDM.L) has a volatility of 9.13%. This indicates that ISDU.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EEDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISDU.L | EEDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.11% | 9.13% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.38% | 19.95% | -7.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.90% | 21.88% | -6.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.50% | 19.46% | -2.96% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 20.79% | -4.51% |
ISDU.L vs. EEDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISDU.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than EEDM.L's 0.18% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISDU.L vs. EEDM.L - Dividend Comparison
ISDU.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.65%, less than EEDM.L's 1.65% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EEDM.L iShares MSCI EM CTB Enhanced ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 1.65% | 1.89% | 2.37% | 2.37% | 2.59% | 1.97% | 1.54% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
ISDU.L iShares MSCI USA Islamic UCITS ETF | 0.65% | 0.39% | 0.90% | 1.10% | 1.52% | 1.01% | 1.39% | 1.37% | 1.49% | 1.38% | 1.34% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ISDU.L and EEDM.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EEDM.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EEDM.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for ISDU.L.
ISDU.L is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while EEDM.L is Emerging Markets Equities. ISDU.L tracks MSCI USA Islamic Index, while EEDM.L tracks MSCI EM ESG Enhanced CTB Index. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for ISDU.L and 0.18% for EEDM.L.
Find the right allocation for ISDU.L and EEDM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer