ISCIX vs. QILGX

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

ISCIX (Federated Hermes International Small-Mid Company Fund IS) and QILGX (Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund) are both mutual funds - ISCIX is a Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities fund tracking the MSCI ACWI ex USA SMID Cap Index, while QILGX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Federated. Over the past 10 years, ISCIX returned 11.10%/yr vs 20.19%/yr for QILGX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. ISCIX charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for QILGX.

Performance

ISCIX vs. QILGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes International Small-Mid Company Fund IS (ISCIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCIX achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than QILGX's 4.35% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCIX has underperformed QILGX with an annualized return of 11.10%, while QILGX has yielded a comparatively higher 20.19% annualized return.

ISCIX

• 1D: 0.02%
• 1M: 0.68%
• YTD: 10.97%
• 6M: 10.47%
• 1Y: 20.88%
• 3Y*: 18.45%
• 5Y*: 6.16%
• 10Y*: 11.10%

QILGX

• 1D: -0.82%
• 1M: -1.24%
• YTD: 4.35%
• 6M: 4.18%
• 1Y: 19.88%
• 3Y*: 25.72%
• 5Y*: 16.65%
• 10Y*: 20.19%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCIX vs. QILGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISCIX Federated Hermes International Small-Mid Company Fund IS	10.97%	34.34%	5.73%	12.85%	-23.42%	6.25%	31.54%	32.03%	-18.74%	34.98%
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund	4.35%	19.46%	40.83%	39.63%	-24.86%	30.46%	38.39%	32.01%	1.52%	25.42%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCIX and QILGX is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.39
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.63
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.68
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 31, 2008	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between ISCIX and QILGX has dropped to 0.39 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

ISCIX vs. QILGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCIX

ISCIX Risk / Return Rank: 33
ISCIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
ISCIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 34
ISCIX Omega Ratio Rank: 33
ISCIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
ISCIX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

QILGX

QILGX Risk / Return Rank: 21
QILGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
QILGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
QILGX Omega Ratio Rank: 28
QILGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
QILGX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCIX vs. QILGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes International Small-Mid Company Fund IS (ISCIX) and Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISCIX	QILGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	1.26	+0.26
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.24	1.80	+0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.25	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.00	1.37	+0.62
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.37	4.30	+3.06

ISCIX vs. QILGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is comparable to the QILGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCIX and QILGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISCIX vs. QILGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCIX drawdown since its inception was -62.00%, which is greater than QILGX's maximum drawdown of -53.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCIX and QILGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISCIX	QILGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.00%	-53.48%	-8.52%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.88%	-15.55%	+3.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.85%	-24.71%	+10.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.17%	-30.05%	-10.12%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.17%	-31.68%	-8.49%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.75%	-4.91%	+3.16%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.12%	-8.94%	-6.18%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.09%	4.95%	-1.86%

Volatility

ISCIX vs. QILGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes International Small-Mid Company Fund IS (ISCIX) is 5.51%, while Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund (QILGX) has a volatility of 6.24%. This indicates that ISCIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QILGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISCIX	QILGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.51%	6.24%	-0.73%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.04%	13.16%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.59%	16.96%	-1.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.27%	21.17%	-3.90%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.27%	21.32%	-4.05%

ISCIX vs. QILGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCIX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QILGX's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISCIX vs. QILGX - Dividend Comparison

ISCIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.72%, more than QILGX's 2.96% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ISCIX Federated Hermes International Small-Mid Company Fund IS	6.72%	7.45%	0.00%	1.05%	1.04%	7.82%	5.64%	4.97%	15.45%	6.38%	0.90%	12.28%
QILGX Federated Hermes MDT Large Cap Growth Fund	2.96%	3.09%	6.60%	1.47%	13.57%	19.44%	7.47%	5.07%	10.33%	7.40%	0.55%	11.76%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISCIX and QILGX in my portfolio?

ISCIX and QILGX have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISCIX or QILGX?

QILGX has higher volatility (6.24%) compared to ISCIX (5.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCIX dropped -62.00% vs QILGX's -53.48%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.