PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCF vs. GWX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCF vs. GWX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCF achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than GWX's 11.79% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCF has outperformed GWX with an annualized return of 9.19%, while GWX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.57% annualized return.


ISCF

1D
-1.13%
1M
1.65%
YTD
7.28%
6M
10.16%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
9.19%

GWX

1D
-1.21%
1M
0.57%
YTD
11.79%
6M
14.68%
1Y
30.65%
3Y*
17.00%
5Y*
5.61%
10Y*
7.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCF vs. GWX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
7.28%33.65%4.75%11.50%-15.07%13.31%7.65%26.32%-18.76%38.13%
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
11.79%35.89%0.21%10.94%-19.98%9.66%13.41%18.18%-18.97%28.88%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCF and GWX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2015

0.86

The correlation between ISCF and GWX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCF vs. GWX - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCF
GWX

Industrials

23.3%
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
11.2%

Financial Services

12.3%
7.8%

Basic Materials

11.2%
14.5%

Technology

10.5%
15.1%

Real Estate

8.8%
7.2%

Healthcare

5.4%
8.5%

Energy

4.8%
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
4.7%

Communication Services

3.8%
2.9%

Utilities

3.6%
1.3%

Industrials

ISCF
23.3%
GWX
22.0%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCF
12.4%
GWX
11.2%

Financial Services

ISCF
12.3%
GWX
7.8%

Basic Materials

ISCF
11.2%
GWX
14.5%

Technology

ISCF
10.5%
GWX
15.1%

Real Estate

ISCF
8.8%
GWX
7.2%

Healthcare

ISCF
5.4%
GWX
8.5%

Energy

ISCF
4.8%
GWX
4.7%

Consumer Defensive

ISCF
4.1%
GWX
4.7%

Communication Services

ISCF
3.8%
GWX
2.9%

Utilities

ISCF
3.6%
GWX
1.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCF vs. GWX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCF
ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

GWX
GWX Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
GWX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWX Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
GWX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWX Martin Ratio Rank: 5757
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCF vs. GWX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCFGWXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.57

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.58

-0.64

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

10.03

-2.75

ISCF vs. GWX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the GWX Sharpe Ratio of 1.98. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCF and GWX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCFGWXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.98

-0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

0.34

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

0.44

+0.09

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.23

+0.26

Drawdowns

ISCF vs. GWX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCF drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, smaller than the maximum GWX drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCF and GWX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCFGWXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.79%

-63.25%

+22.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-11.91%

+0.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-14.73%

+0.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.70%

-34.58%

+3.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.79%

-45.27%

+4.48%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-2.86%

+0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-14.74%

+6.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.06%

-0.04%

Volatility

ISCF vs. GWX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) is 4.33%, while SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF (GWX) has a volatility of 5.21%. This indicates that ISCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GWX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCFGWXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

5.21%

-0.88%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

12.82%

-0.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

15.52%

-1.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

16.74%

-0.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

17.36%

+0.08%

ISCF vs. GWX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both ISCF and GWX have an expense ratio of 0.40%.


Dividends

ISCF vs. GWX - Dividend Comparison

ISCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than GWX's 2.54% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWX
SPDR S&P International Small Cap ETF
2.54%2.83%2.71%2.64%2.71%2.75%1.74%3.41%2.94%5.18%4.21%2.67%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
3.50%3.76%4.29%3.94%2.73%3.93%2.30%2.87%2.14%1.97%2.89%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, ISCF and GWX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

GWX has higher volatility (5.21%) compared to ISCF (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCF dropped -40.79% vs GWX's -63.25%.

On 10-year performance, ISCF leads with 9.19% vs 7.57% for GWX. Both ETFs have the same 0.40% expense ratio. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, ISCF has performed better with a 9.19% return vs 7.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ISCF and GWX have the same expense ratio: 0.40% per year.

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.54% for GWX.

ISCF tracks MSCI World exUSA SmallCap Diversified Multi-Factor, while GWX tracks S&P Developed Ex-U.S. Under USD2 Billion Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street.

GWX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.98 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCF and GWX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer