ISCF vs. FYLD

Last updated Aug 6, 2026

ISCF (iShares International Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF) and FYLD (Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF) are both Foreign Small & Mid Cap Equities funds. ISCF is passively managed, while FYLD is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISCF returned 9.59%/yr vs 11.60%/yr for FYLD. Their 0.74 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. ISCF charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for FYLD.

Performance

ISCF vs. FYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (ISCF) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCF achieves a 11.63% return, which is significantly lower than FYLD's 21.93% return. Over the past 10 years, ISCF has underperformed FYLD with an annualized return of 9.59%, while FYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 11.60% annualized return.

ISCF

• 1D: 0.64%
• 1M: 2.53%
• 6M: 4.33%
• YTD: 11.63%
• 1Y: 20.40%
• 3Y*: 17.88%
• 5Y*: 8.05%
• 10Y*: 9.59%
• ALL TIME*: 8.74%

FYLD

• 1D: -0.14%
• 1M: 5.37%
• 6M: 9.35%
• YTD: 21.93%
• 1Y: 35.40%
• 3Y*: 21.91%
• 5Y*: 12.79%
• 10Y*: 11.60%
• ALL TIME*: 8.32%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	$1.76M	$1.76M	$3.02M
ISCF iShares International Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF	$1.33M	$1.59M	$2.21M

ISCF vs. FYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
ISCF iShares International Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF	11.63%	33.65%	4.75%	11.50%	-15.07%	13.31%	7.65%	26.32%	-18.76%	38.13%
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	21.93%	34.53%	3.00%	13.18%	-5.53%	18.67%	4.17%	17.83%	-14.47%	29.81%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCF and FYLD is 0.70, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.70
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.78
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.78
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 1, 2015	0.74

The correlation between ISCF and FYLD shifts across timeframes, from 0.70 (1 year) to 0.84 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

ISCF vs. FYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	ISCF	FYLD
Industrials	23.3%	13.7%
Financial Services	13.6%	22.2%
Consumer Cyclical	12.7%	11.4%
Basic Materials	10.9%	7.6%
Technology	10.1%	2.7%
Real Estate	8.6%	-
Healthcare	5.2%	-
Energy	4.4%	25.1%
Consumer Defensive	3.7%	7.5%
Communication Services	3.4%	4.9%
Utilities	3.4%	3.9%

Return for Risk

ISCF vs. FYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

ISCF

ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 46
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 45
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 49

FYLD

FYLD Risk / Return Rank: 94
FYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
FYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
FYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 93
FYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
FYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 94

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

ISCF vs. FYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (ISCF) and Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	ISCF	FYLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.35	2.96	-1.61
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.94	4.07	-2.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	1.52	-0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.81	6.27	-4.47
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.39	19.10	-12.71

ISCF vs. FYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is lower than the FYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCF and FYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

ISCF vs. FYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCF drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, smaller than the maximum FYLD drawdown of -44.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCF and FYLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	ISCF	FYLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.79%	-44.55%	+3.76%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.34%	-5.67%	-5.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.25%	-15.15%	+1.90%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.70%	-25.12%	-5.58%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-40.79%	-44.55%	+3.76%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.55%	+0.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.06%	-8.74%	+0.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.20%	1.86%	+1.34%

Volatility

ISCF vs. FYLD - Volatility Comparison

iShares International Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF (ISCF) has a higher volatility of 4.51% compared to Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF (FYLD) at 2.90%. This indicates that ISCF's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ISCF	FYLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.51%	2.90%	+1.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.93%	9.29%	+3.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.18%	12.03%	+3.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.76%	16.17%	+0.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.17%	17.75%	-0.58%

ISCF vs. FYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCF has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is lower than FYLD's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

ISCF vs. FYLD - Dividend Comparison

ISCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than FYLD's 3.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FYLD Cambria Foreign Shareholder Yield ETF	3.31%	4.07%	5.41%	6.06%	6.13%	4.74%	3.94%	3.73%	5.17%	2.85%	2.72%	3.98%
ISCF iShares International Small-Cap Equity Factor ETF	3.55%	3.76%	4.29%	3.94%	2.73%	3.93%	2.30%	2.87%	2.14%	1.97%	2.89%	1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ISCF and FYLD in my portfolio?

ISCF and FYLD have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ISCF or FYLD?

ISCF has higher volatility (4.51%) compared to FYLD (2.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCF dropped -40.79% vs FYLD's -44.55%.

Which ETF is better, ISCF or FYLD?

On 10-year performance, FYLD leads with 11.60% vs 9.59% for ISCF. On fees, ISCF is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, FYLD has been the lower-risk option at 2.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, ISCF or FYLD?

Over the 10-year period, FYLD has performed better with a 11.60% return vs 9.59%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, ISCF or FYLD?

ISCF is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FYLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, ISCF or FYLD?

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.55%, compared with 3.31% for FYLD.

What is the main difference between ISCF and FYLD?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for ISCF and 0.59% for FYLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.96 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.