PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ISCF vs. DFIS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ISCF vs. DFIS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISCF achieves a 7.28% return, which is significantly lower than DFIS's 10.27% return.


ISCF

1D
-1.13%
1M
1.65%
YTD
7.28%
6M
10.16%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
7.26%
10Y*
9.19%

DFIS

1D
-1.12%
1M
2.92%
YTD
10.27%
6M
13.97%
1Y
28.03%
3Y*
19.32%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISCF vs. DFIS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
7.28%33.65%4.75%11.50%-10.89%
DFIS
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
10.27%37.49%3.80%15.19%-12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between ISCF and DFIS is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 25, 2022

0.97

The correlation between ISCF and DFIS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

ISCF vs. DFIS - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
ISCF
DFIS

Industrials

23.3%
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.4%
13.5%

Financial Services

12.3%
12.0%

Basic Materials

11.2%
14.2%

Technology

10.5%
9.6%

Real Estate

8.8%
3.7%

Healthcare

5.4%
5.2%

Energy

4.8%
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
5.0%

Communication Services

3.8%
3.6%

Utilities

3.6%
3.3%

Industrials

ISCF
23.3%
DFIS
23.9%

Consumer Cyclical

ISCF
12.4%
DFIS
13.5%

Financial Services

ISCF
12.3%
DFIS
12.0%

Basic Materials

ISCF
11.2%
DFIS
14.2%

Technology

ISCF
10.5%
DFIS
9.6%

Real Estate

ISCF
8.8%
DFIS
3.7%

Healthcare

ISCF
5.4%
DFIS
5.2%

Energy

ISCF
4.8%
DFIS
6.0%

Consumer Defensive

ISCF
4.1%
DFIS
5.0%

Communication Services

ISCF
3.8%
DFIS
3.6%

Utilities

ISCF
3.6%
DFIS
3.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ISCF vs. DFIS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ISCF
ISCF Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
ISCF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISCF Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISCF Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
ISCF Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISCF Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank

DFIS
DFIS Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
DFIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DFIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
DFIS Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
DFIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
DFIS Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISCF vs. DFIS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) and Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ISCFDFISDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.35

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.94

2.26

-0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.28

8.73

-1.45

ISCF vs. DFIS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISCF Sharpe Ratio is 1.54, which is comparable to the DFIS Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISCF and DFIS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ISCFDFISDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.54

1.94

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.67

-0.18

Drawdowns

ISCF vs. DFIS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISCF drawdown since its inception was -40.79%, which is greater than DFIS's maximum drawdown of -27.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISCF and DFIS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ISCFDFISDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.79%

-27.23%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.34%

-12.44%

+1.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.85%

-13.55%

-0.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.79%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.64%

-1.91%

-0.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.14%

-6.17%

-1.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.02%

3.22%

-0.20%

Volatility

ISCF vs. DFIS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF (ISCF) is 4.33%, while Dimensional International Small Cap ETF (DFIS) has a volatility of 4.71%. This indicates that ISCF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DFIS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ISCFDFISDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.33%

4.71%

-0.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.86%

12.04%

-0.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.39%

14.54%

-0.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.66%

17.32%

-0.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.44%

17.32%

+0.12%

ISCF vs. DFIS - Expense Ratio Comparison

ISCF has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIS's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

ISCF vs. DFIS - Dividend Comparison

ISCF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.50%, more than DFIS's 2.02% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DFIS
Dimensional International Small Cap ETF
2.02%2.23%2.19%2.36%1.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ISCF
iShares MSCI Intl Small-Cap Multifactor ETF
3.50%3.76%4.29%3.94%2.73%3.93%2.30%2.87%2.14%1.97%2.89%1.46%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, ISCF and DFIS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

DFIS has higher volatility (4.71%) compared to ISCF (4.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ISCF dropped -40.79% vs DFIS's -27.23%.

On 3-year performance, DFIS leads with 19.32% vs 17.40% for ISCF. On fees, DFIS is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, ISCF has been the lower-risk option at 4.33%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, DFIS has performed better with a 19.32% return vs 17.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DFIS is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for ISCF.

ISCF has the higher dividend yield at 3.50%, compared with 2.02% for DFIS.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for ISCF and 0.39% for DFIS.

DFIS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.54), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISCF and DFIS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer