PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
ISAG.L vs. QUID.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

ISAG.L vs. QUID.L

Last updated Jul 16, 2026
Documentation

ISAG.L (iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and QUID.L (PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - ISAG.L tracks the iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) while QUID.L tracks the PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, ISAG.L returned 7.24%/yr vs 2.21%/yr for QUID.L. At a 0.22 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

ISAG.L vs. QUID.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAG.L) and PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

ISAG.L is traded in USD, while QUID.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the QUID.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ISAG.L achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than QUID.L's 2.67% return. Over the past 10 years, ISAG.L has outperformed QUID.L with an annualized return of 7.24%, while QUID.L has yielded a comparatively lower 2.21% annualized return.

ISAG.L

1D
0.72%
1M
1.26%
6M
5.61%
YTD
11.78%
1Y
14.56%
3Y*
5.53%
5Y*
4.56%
10Y*
7.24%

QUID.L

1D
0.00%
1M
1.16%
6M
2.59%
YTD
2.67%
1Y
5.46%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
2.93%
10Y*
2.21%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ISAG.L vs. QUID.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
ISAG.L
iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		11.78%16.78%-5.66%-8.90%2.73%23.33%10.28%17.65%-12.99%19.93%
QUID.L
PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF		2.67%12.80%3.91%10.49%-11.55%-0.98%3.80%5.64%-5.42%10.09%

Correlation

The correlation between ISAG.L and QUID.L is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.22

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.27

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2011

0.22

The correlation between ISAG.L and QUID.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc)

PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF

Return for Risk

ISAG.L vs. QUID.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
ISAG.L
ISAG.L Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
ISAG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ISAG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 4242
Sortino Ratio Rank
ISAG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
ISAG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
ISAG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
QUID.L
QUID.L Risk / Return Rank: 9999
Overall Rank
QUID.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QUID.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
QUID.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
QUID.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QUID.L Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ISAG.L vs. QUID.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAG.L) and PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

ISAG.LQUID.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.17
0.77

+0.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.81
1.18

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.14

+0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.55

1.16

+0.38

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.36

2.63

+1.73

ISAG.L vs. QUID.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ISAG.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the QUID.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ISAG.L and QUID.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ISAG.L vs. QUID.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ISAG.L drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, roughly equal to the maximum QUID.L drawdown of -35.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAG.L and QUID.L.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

ISAG.LQUID.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-37.16%

-35.66%

-1.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-4.45%

-5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.13%

-7.76%

-11.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.22%

-25.00%

-8.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.16%

-26.28%

-10.88%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.20%

-2.30%

-4.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.38%

-14.60%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

1.97%

+1.65%

Volatility

ISAG.L vs. QUID.L - Volatility Comparison

iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAG.L) has a higher volatility of 2.94% compared to PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF (QUID.L) at 1.70%. This indicates that ISAG.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QUID.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

ISAG.LQUID.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.94%

1.70%

+1.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.25%

5.06%

+5.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.50%

6.68%

+6.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.62%

8.63%

+8.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.84%

8.88%

+8.96%

Dividends

ISAG.L vs. QUID.L - Dividend Comparison

ISAG.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QUID.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.17%.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ISAG.L
iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QUID.L
PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF		4.17%4.19%4.67%3.69%0.66%0.08%0.31%0.73%0.52%0.33%0.59%0.55%

Frequently Asked Questions

ISAG.L and QUID.L have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ISAG.L tracks iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while QUID.L tracks PIMCO Sterling Short Maturity UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and PIMCO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ISAG.L and QUID.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer