ISAG.L vs. FLXK.L
ISAG.L (iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and FLXK.L (Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - ISAG.L tracks the iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) while FLXK.L tracks the Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, ISAG.L returned 4.56%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for FLXK.L. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. ISAG.L charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for FLXK.L.
Performance
ISAG.L vs. FLXK.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ISAG.L achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly lower than FLXK.L's 75.46% return.
ISAG.L
- 1D
- 0.72%
- 1M
- 1.26%
- 6M
- 5.61%
- YTD
- 11.78%
- 1Y
- 14.56%
- 3Y*
- 5.53%
- 5Y*
- 4.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.24%
FLXK.L
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -19.56%
- 6M
- 57.13%
- YTD
- 75.46%
- 1Y
- 141.50%
- 3Y*
- 39.45%
- 5Y*
- 15.67%
- 10Y*
- —
ISAG.L vs. FLXK.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ISAG.L iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 11.78% | 16.78% | -5.66% | -8.90% | 2.73% | 23.33% | 10.28% | 11.15% |
FLXK.L Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF | 75.46% | 94.79% | -21.63% | 20.77% | -28.01% | -6.85% | 47.31% | 13.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between ISAG.L and FLXK.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2019 | 0.45 |
Over the past year, the correlation between ISAG.L and FLXK.L has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.45, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ISAG.L vs. FLXK.L — Risk / Return Rank
ISAG.L
FLXK.L
ISAG.L vs. FLXK.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAG.L) and Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| ISAG.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.97 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.47 | -0.25 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.55 | 5.86 | -4.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.36 | 18.40 | -14.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
ISAG.L vs. FLXK.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ISAG.L drawdown since its inception was -37.16%, smaller than the maximum FLXK.L drawdown of -49.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ISAG.L and FLXK.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ISAG.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -37.16% | -49.43% | +12.27% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.17% | -24.10% | +13.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.13% | -28.54% | +9.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.22% | -47.00% | +13.78% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.16% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.20% | -24.10% | +16.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.38% | -20.23% | +9.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.62% | 7.70% | -4.08% |
Volatility
ISAG.L vs. FLXK.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (ISAG.L) is 2.94%, while Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF (FLXK.L) has a volatility of 19.75%. This indicates that ISAG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLXK.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ISAG.L | FLXK.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.94% | 19.75% | -16.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.25% | 41.53% | -31.28% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.50% | 45.08% | -31.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.62% | 29.63% | -12.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.84% | 29.61% | -11.77% |
ISAG.L vs. FLXK.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
ISAG.L has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FLXK.L's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
ISAG.L vs. FLXK.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither ISAG.L nor FLXK.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
ISAG.L and FLXK.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, FLXK.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FLXK.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for ISAG.L.
ISAG.L tracks iShares Agribusiness UCITS ETF USD (Acc), while FLXK.L tracks Franklin FTSE Korea UCITS ETF. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Franklin. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for ISAG.L and 0.09% for FLXK.L.
Find the right allocation for ISAG.L and FLXK.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer