IS3T.DE vs. CSY9.DE
IS3T.DE (iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF) and CSY9.DE (CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD) are both Global Equities funds - IS3T.DE tracks the MSCI World Mid Cap Equal Weighted while CSY9.DE tracks the MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS3T.DE returned 6.43%/yr vs 6.22%/yr for CSY9.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IS3T.DE charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for CSY9.DE.
Performance
IS3T.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3T.DE achieves a 6.98% return, which is significantly higher than CSY9.DE's 3.19% return.
IS3T.DE
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- 0.74%
- YTD
- 6.98%
- 6M
- 8.06%
- 1Y
- 15.24%
- 3Y*
- 11.56%
- 5Y*
- 6.43%
- 10Y*
- 7.96%
CSY9.DE
- 1D
- 0.16%
- 1M
- 2.71%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 3.19%
- 1Y
- 3.39%
- 3Y*
- 6.65%
- 5Y*
- 6.22%
- 10Y*
- —
IS3T.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3T.DE iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF | 6.98% | 8.66% | 11.91% | 12.19% | -13.42% | 22.31% | 16.42% |
CSY9.DE CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD | 3.19% | -0.67% | 16.05% | 5.76% | -5.25% | 23.30% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3T.DE and CSY9.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.61 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 28, 2020 | 0.66 |
The correlation between IS3T.DE and CSY9.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3T.DE vs. CSY9.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS3T.DE
CSY9.DE
IS3T.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IS3T.DE) and CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS3T.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.07 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.15 | 0.69 | +1.46 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.02 | 1.54 | +6.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS3T.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.32 | 0.38 | +0.93 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.46 | 0.51 | -0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.61 | -0.08 |
Drawdowns
IS3T.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3T.DE drawdown since its inception was -36.87%, which is greater than CSY9.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3T.DE and CSY9.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3T.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -36.87% | -13.92% | -22.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -4.48% | -2.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.61% | -13.92% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.61% | -13.92% | -4.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -36.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.59% | -2.72% | +2.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.74% | -3.70% | -2.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.90% | 2.00% | -0.10% |
Volatility
IS3T.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Edge MSCI World Size Factor UCITS ETF (IS3T.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.77% compared to CSIF (IE) MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility Blue UCITS ETF B USD (CSY9.DE) at 2.09%. This indicates that IS3T.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CSY9.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3T.DE | CSY9.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.77% | 2.09% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.61% | 5.48% | +3.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.58% | 8.07% | +3.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.90% | 12.03% | +1.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.25% | 11.91% | +3.34% |
IS3T.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3T.DE has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CSY9.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS3T.DE vs. CSY9.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS3T.DE nor CSY9.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3T.DE and CSY9.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CSY9.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CSY9.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IS3T.DE.
IS3T.DE tracks MSCI World Mid Cap Equal Weighted, while CSY9.DE tracks MSCI World ESG Leaders Minimum Volatility. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Credit Suisse. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IS3T.DE and 0.25% for CSY9.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS3T.DE and CSY9.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer