PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3M.DE vs. DXSA.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3M.DE vs. DXSA.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (IS3M.DE) and Xtrackers Euro Stoxx Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (DXSA.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3M.DE achieves a 0.92% return, which is significantly lower than DXSA.DE's 9.28% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3M.DE has underperformed DXSA.DE with an annualized return of 1.01%, while DXSA.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 9.19% annualized return.


IS3M.DE

1D
0.04%
1M
0.33%
YTD
0.92%
6M
1.05%
1Y
2.27%
3Y*
3.34%
5Y*
2.10%
10Y*
1.01%

DXSA.DE

1D
0.23%
1M
1.51%
YTD
9.28%
6M
11.75%
1Y
19.18%
3Y*
19.44%
5Y*
12.02%
10Y*
9.19%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3M.DE vs. DXSA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3M.DE
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
0.92%2.61%4.12%3.42%-0.29%-0.36%0.09%0.34%-0.62%-0.09%
DXSA.DE
Xtrackers Euro Stoxx Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D
9.28%33.40%10.36%17.93%-9.82%18.67%-9.07%22.54%-13.01%10.40%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3M.DE and DXSA.DE is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.04

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2013

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3M.DE vs. DXSA.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3M.DE
IS3M.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
IS3M.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 9393
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3M.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

DXSA.DE
DXSA.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
DXSA.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DXSA.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
DXSA.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5656
Omega Ratio Rank
DXSA.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
DXSA.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3M.DE vs. DXSA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (IS3M.DE) and Xtrackers Euro Stoxx Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (DXSA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS3M.DEDXSA.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.15

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.64

1.34

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.59

2.59

+5.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

49.96

8.70

+41.26

IS3M.DE vs. DXSA.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3M.DE Sharpe Ratio is 2.95, which is higher than the DXSA.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3M.DE and DXSA.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS3M.DEDXSA.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

1.87

+1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.74

0.85

+1.90

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.59

+0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.16

+0.70

Drawdowns

IS3M.DE vs. DXSA.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3M.DE drawdown since its inception was -3.80%, smaller than the maximum DXSA.DE drawdown of -71.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3M.DE and DXSA.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3M.DEDXSA.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-3.80%

-71.31%

+67.51%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.30%

-7.57%

+7.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-0.47%

-15.08%

+14.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-1.21%

-23.14%

+21.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-3.80%

-36.15%

+32.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.01%

-0.96%

+0.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.29%

-23.06%

+22.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.05%

2.26%

-2.21%

Volatility

IS3M.DE vs. DXSA.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF (IS3M.DE) is 0.29%, while Xtrackers Euro Stoxx Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D (DXSA.DE) has a volatility of 2.73%. This indicates that IS3M.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DXSA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3M.DEDXSA.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.29%

2.73%

-2.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.59%

8.39%

-7.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.76%

10.51%

-9.75%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.76%

14.03%

-13.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.11%

15.60%

-14.49%

IS3M.DE vs. DXSA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3M.DE has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than DXSA.DE's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS3M.DE vs. DXSA.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS3M.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.29%, less than DXSA.DE's 4.51% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DXSA.DE
Xtrackers Euro Stoxx Quality Dividend UCITS ETF 1D
4.51%4.96%5.39%4.32%4.62%5.73%5.96%2.34%4.64%3.00%2.93%0.14%
IS3M.DE
iShares € Ultrashort Bond UCITS ETF
3.29%2.74%3.80%2.17%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.13%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3M.DE and DXSA.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IS3M.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS3M.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for DXSA.DE.

IS3M.DE is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while DXSA.DE is Europe Equities. IS3M.DE tracks Markit iBoxx EUR Liquid Investment Grade Ultrashort Index (EUR), while DXSA.DE tracks EURO STOXX® Quality Dividend 50. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for IS3M.DE and 0.30% for DXSA.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3M.DE and DXSA.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer