PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3F.DE vs. CBUP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3F.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE) and iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3F.DE achieves a 5.01% return, which is significantly higher than CBUP.DE's -0.06% return.


IS3F.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
1.13%
6M
3.17%
YTD
5.01%
1Y
5.81%
3Y*
6.69%
5Y*
6.02%
10Y*
4.00%

CBUP.DE

1D
0.12%
1M
-0.96%
6M
-0.41%
YTD
-0.06%
1Y
0.60%
3Y*
2.62%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3F.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IS3F.DE
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
5.01%-6.28%14.29%7.35%-0.69%
CBUP.DE
iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
-0.06%0.99%2.05%7.83%-11.21%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3F.DE and CBUP.DE is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2022

-0.18

The correlation between IS3F.DE and CBUP.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to -0.15 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3F.DE vs. CBUP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3F.DE
IS3F.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
IS3F.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3030
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3F.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

CBUP.DE
CBUP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
CBUP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1111
Sortino Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1111
Omega Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
CBUP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3F.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE) and iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IS3F.DECBUP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.79

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.03

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

0.19

+1.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

0.48

+4.61

IS3F.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3F.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the CBUP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3F.DE and CBUP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IS3F.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3F.DE drawdown since its inception was -27.25%, which is greater than CBUP.DE's maximum drawdown of -12.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3F.DE and CBUP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3F.DECBUP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.25%

-12.62%

-14.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-3.19%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.67%

-3.58%

-8.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.84%

-1.90%

-1.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.16%

-5.07%

-3.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.26%

-0.12%

Volatility

IS3F.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS3F.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.74% compared to iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc) (CBUP.DE) at 1.24%. This indicates that IS3F.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CBUP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3F.DECBUP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.74%

1.24%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.56%

3.66%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.33%

4.18%

+2.15%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.67%

5.87%

+1.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.21%

5.87%

+2.34%

IS3F.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3F.DE has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CBUP.DE's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS3F.DE vs. CBUP.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS3F.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.27%, while CBUP.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CBUP.DE
iShares € Green Bond UCITS ETF EUR (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS3F.DE
iShares $ Corp Bond Interest Rate Hedged UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
4.27%4.77%5.36%4.95%2.10%1.50%2.62%3.52%2.81%2.25%2.36%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3F.DE and CBUP.DE have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CBUP.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CBUP.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for IS3F.DE.

IS3F.DE tracks Markit iBoxx USD Liquid Investment Grade Interest Rate Hedged Index, while CBUP.DE tracks Bloomberg MSCI Euro Green Bond SRI (including Nuclear Power) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for IS3F.DE and 0.20% for CBUP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3F.DE and CBUP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer