IS3C.DE vs. UEFS.DE
IS3C.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)) and UEFS.DE (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - IS3C.DE tracks the JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged) while UEFS.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS3C.DE returned -0.58%/yr vs 3.55%/yr for UEFS.DE. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS3C.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for UEFS.DE.
Performance
IS3C.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS3C.DE achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than UEFS.DE's 3.71% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3C.DE has underperformed UEFS.DE with an annualized return of -0.58%, while UEFS.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 3.55% annualized return.
IS3C.DE
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 0.40%
- YTD
- -1.63%
- 6M
- -1.60%
- 1Y
- 2.73%
- 3Y*
- 2.01%
- 5Y*
- -3.40%
- 10Y*
- -0.58%
UEFS.DE
- 1D
- -0.03%
- 1M
- 1.91%
- YTD
- 3.71%
- 6M
- 3.67%
- 1Y
- 11.43%
- 3Y*
- 8.56%
- 5Y*
- 3.30%
- 10Y*
- 3.55%
IS3C.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3C.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | -1.63% | 5.32% | -1.72% | 5.39% | -20.57% | -3.53% | 3.22% | 12.58% | -8.60% | 7.87% |
UEFS.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 3.71% | 2.37% | 13.84% | 8.28% | -14.67% | 5.66% | -4.70% | 17.07% | 0.35% | -3.07% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS3C.DE and UEFS.DE is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 10, 2016 | 0.48 |
The correlation between IS3C.DE and UEFS.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.53 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS3C.DE vs. UEFS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS3C.DE
UEFS.DE
IS3C.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS3C.DE | UEFS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.53 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.38 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.48 | 3.96 | -3.48 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 12.59 | -11.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS3C.DE | UEFS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.44 | 1.98 | -1.53 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.38 | 0.38 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.06 | 0.38 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.00 | 0.44 | -0.44 |
Drawdowns
IS3C.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS3C.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.78%, which is greater than UEFS.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3C.DE and UEFS.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS3C.DE | UEFS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.78% | -24.26% | -6.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.62% | -2.87% | -2.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.94% | -13.70% | +4.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.47% | -17.84% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.78% | -24.26% | -6.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.90% | -0.03% | -17.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.16% | -7.41% | -1.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 0.91% | +0.88% |
Volatility
IS3C.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.10% compared to UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UEFS.DE) at 1.27%. This indicates that IS3C.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UEFS.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS3C.DE | UEFS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.10% | 1.27% | +0.83% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.14% | 3.77% | +1.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.18% | 5.76% | +0.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.94% | 8.69% | +0.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.30% | 9.37% | -0.07% |
IS3C.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS3C.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than UEFS.DE's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS3C.DE vs. UEFS.DE - Dividend Comparison
IS3C.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UEFS.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.50%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS3C.DE iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 5.39% | 3.93% | 3.85% | 4.77% | 5.76% | 3.88% | 5.34% | 4.72% |
UEFS.DE UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg USD Emerging Markets Sovereign UCITS ETF (USD) Dist | 6.50% | 7.96% | 6.14% | 6.46% | 6.08% | 4.22% | 5.09% | 4.60% | 4.53% | 4.90% | 2.30% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS3C.DE and UEFS.DE have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UEFS.DE is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UEFS.DE is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS3C.DE.
IS3C.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged), while UEFS.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets USD Sovereign & Agency 3% Country Capped. They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IS3C.DE and 0.25% for UEFS.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS3C.DE and UEFS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer