PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS3C.DE vs. QDVE.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS3C.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS3C.DE achieves a -1.63% return, which is significantly lower than QDVE.DE's 24.06% return. Over the past 10 years, IS3C.DE has underperformed QDVE.DE with an annualized return of -0.58%, while QDVE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 26.04% annualized return.


IS3C.DE

1D
0.23%
1M
0.40%
YTD
-1.63%
6M
-1.60%
1Y
2.73%
3Y*
2.01%
5Y*
-3.40%
10Y*
-0.58%

QDVE.DE

1D
-2.26%
1M
13.91%
YTD
24.06%
6M
23.05%
1Y
49.27%
3Y*
30.81%
5Y*
25.33%
10Y*
26.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS3C.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS3C.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
-1.63%5.32%-1.72%5.39%-20.57%-3.53%3.22%12.58%-8.60%7.87%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
24.06%9.99%46.12%54.14%-25.83%46.77%29.69%53.86%3.04%21.00%

Correlation

The correlation between IS3C.DE and QDVE.DE is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 3, 2015

0.32

The correlation between IS3C.DE and QDVE.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (3 years) to 0.32 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS3C.DE vs. QDVE.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS3C.DE
IS3C.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
IS3C.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS3C.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

QDVE.DE
QDVE.DE Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDVE.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS3C.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS3C.DEQDVE.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.40

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.39

-0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

3.14

-2.66

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.52

8.31

-6.79

IS3C.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS3C.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.44, which is lower than the QDVE.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS3C.DE and QDVE.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS3C.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

2.40

-1.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.38

1.10

-1.48

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.06

1.19

-1.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.00

1.07

-1.07

Drawdowns

IS3C.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS3C.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.78%, roughly equal to the maximum QDVE.DE drawdown of -31.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS3C.DE and QDVE.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS3C.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.78%

-31.45%

+0.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.62%

-15.59%

+9.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.94%

-29.83%

+20.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.47%

-29.83%

-0.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.78%

-31.45%

+0.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.90%

-3.08%

-14.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.16%

-5.80%

-3.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

5.91%

-4.12%

Volatility

IS3C.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS3C.DE) is 2.10%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF (QDVE.DE) has a volatility of 7.12%. This indicates that IS3C.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS3C.DEQDVE.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.10%

7.12%

-5.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.14%

14.85%

-9.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.18%

20.42%

-14.24%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.94%

22.71%

-13.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.30%

21.73%

-12.43%

IS3C.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS3C.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than QDVE.DE's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS3C.DE vs. QDVE.DE - Dividend Comparison

Neither IS3C.DE nor QDVE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS3C.DE
iShares J.P. Morgan USD EM Bond EUR Hedged UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.00%0.00%0.00%3.58%5.39%3.93%3.85%4.77%5.76%3.88%5.34%4.72%
QDVE.DE
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS3C.DE and QDVE.DE have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, QDVE.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

QDVE.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS3C.DE.

IS3C.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while QDVE.DE is Technology Equities. IS3C.DE tracks JP Morgan EMBI Global Core (EUR Hedged), while QDVE.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IS3C.DE and 0.15% for QDVE.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS3C.DE and QDVE.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer