PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS15.L vs. GBPC.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS15.L vs. GBPC.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

IS15.L is traded in GBP, while GBPC.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the GBPC.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS15.L achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly higher than GBPC.L's 0.12% return.


IS15.L

1D
-0.19%
1M
0.56%
YTD
0.59%
6M
1.09%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
6.08%
5Y*
2.33%
10Y*
2.28%

GBPC.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.04%
YTD
0.12%
6M
0.62%
1Y
4.88%
3Y*
6.29%
5Y*
-0.17%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS15.L vs. GBPC.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IS15.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF
0.59%6.24%4.89%7.16%-6.09%-0.84%0.40%
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
0.12%6.83%2.78%8.45%-17.18%-2.43%-0.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IS15.L and GBPC.L is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.63

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 10, 2020

0.47

The correlation between IS15.L and GBPC.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (all time) to 0.63 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS15.L vs. GBPC.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS15.L
IS15.L Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
IS15.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS15.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS15.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
IS15.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS15.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5353
Martin Ratio Rank

GBPC.L
GBPC.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
GBPC.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS15.L vs. GBPC.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) and L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS15.LGBPC.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.43

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.15

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.36

1.18

+1.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.07

3.91

+5.16

IS15.L vs. GBPC.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS15.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is higher than the GBPC.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.78. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS15.L and GBPC.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS15.LGBPC.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.77

0.78

+0.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

-0.02

+0.73

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.73

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.87

-0.10

+0.98

Drawdowns

IS15.L vs. GBPC.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS15.L drawdown since its inception was -12.18%, smaller than the maximum GBPC.L drawdown of -28.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS15.L and GBPC.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS15.LGBPC.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.18%

-28.18%

+16.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.94%

-4.14%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.94%

-4.14%

+2.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-12.18%

-27.49%

+15.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-12.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.30%

-4.53%

+4.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.12%

-11.46%

+10.34%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.50%

1.25%

-0.75%

Volatility

IS15.L vs. GBPC.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF (IS15.L) is 1.02%, while L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF (GBPC.L) has a volatility of 3.33%. This indicates that IS15.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GBPC.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS15.LGBPC.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

3.33%

-2.31%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.32%

5.09%

-2.77%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58%

6.23%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.30%

8.19%

-4.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.13%

8.15%

-5.02%

IS15.L vs. GBPC.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS15.L has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than GBPC.L's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS15.L vs. GBPC.L - Dividend Comparison

IS15.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.54%, less than GBPC.L's 5.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GBPC.L
L&G ESG GBP Corporate Bond UCITS ETF
5.14%5.00%4.86%3.58%2.16%0.87%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS15.L
iShares GBP Corporate Bond 0-5yr UCITS ETF
4.54%4.35%4.06%3.05%1.80%1.72%1.81%2.03%2.08%2.15%2.55%2.91%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS15.L and GBPC.L have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GBPC.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GBPC.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IS15.L.

IS15.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts 1-5 TR, while GBPC.L tracks Markit iBoxx GBP NonGilts TR. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Legal & General. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IS15.L and 0.09% for GBPC.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS15.L and GBPC.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer