IS0S.DE vs. SEAD.DE
IS0S.DE (iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and SEAD.DE (UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds - IS0S.DE tracks the Bloomberg Emerging Markets Asia Local Currency Govt Country Capped Index while SEAD.DE tracks the JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Diversified 3% capped 1-5 (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS0S.DE returned 0.54%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for SEAD.DE. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS0S.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for SEAD.DE.
Performance
IS0S.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS0S.DE achieves a -1.86% return, which is significantly lower than SEAD.DE's 1.42% return.
IS0S.DE
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- 6M
- -2.06%
- YTD
- -1.86%
- 1Y
- -3.00%
- 3Y*
- 0.27%
- 5Y*
- 0.54%
- 10Y*
- 1.09%
SEAD.DE
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.11%
- 6M
- 1.42%
- YTD
- 1.42%
- 1Y
- 5.06%
- 3Y*
- 6.12%
- 5Y*
- 0.99%
- 10Y*
- —
IS0S.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0S.DE iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | -1.86% | -5.90% | 7.58% | 1.14% | -1.88% | 3.53% | -0.48% | -0.07% |
SEAD.DE UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist | 1.42% | 7.68% | 5.50% | 5.69% | -12.29% | -0.78% | 1.78% | 1.13% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0S.DE and SEAD.DE is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 29, 2019 | 0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0S.DE vs. SEAD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS0S.DE
SEAD.DE
IS0S.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0S.DE) and UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (SEAD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IS0S.DE | SEAD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.33 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.92 | 1.36 | -0.45 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.48 | 2.42 | -2.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.94 | 9.89 | -10.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IS0S.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0S.DE drawdown since its inception was -30.09%, which is greater than SEAD.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0S.DE and SEAD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0S.DE | SEAD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.09% | -17.98% | -12.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.25% | -2.08% | -4.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.41% | -2.40% | -9.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.41% | -17.98% | +6.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -16.46% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.65% | -0.40% | -9.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.48% | -5.65% | -3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.19% | 0.51% | +2.68% |
Volatility
IS0S.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0S.DE) has a higher volatility of 1.16% compared to UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist (SEAD.DE) at 0.59%. This indicates that IS0S.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SEAD.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0S.DE | SEAD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.16% | 0.59% | +0.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.03% | 2.36% | +1.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.28% | 2.85% | +2.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.16% | 4.30% | +1.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.36% | 4.81% | +5.55% |
IS0S.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS0S.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SEAD.DE's 0.38% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS0S.DE vs. SEAD.DE - Dividend Comparison
IS0S.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.54%, less than SEAD.DE's 6.88% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0S.DE iShares Emerging Asia Local Govt Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 3.54% | 3.49% | 2.94% | 2.89% | 2.96% | 2.30% | 3.05% | 2.44% | 2.50% | 2.19% | 2.90% | 1.15% |
SEAD.DE UBS ETF (LU) J.P. Morgan USD EM Diversified Bond 1-5 UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Dist | 6.88% | 4.97% | 6.21% | 4.80% | 4.53% | 4.02% | 2.40% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0S.DE and SEAD.DE have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEAD.DE is cheaper at 0.38% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEAD.DE is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS0S.DE.
IS0S.DE tracks Bloomberg Emerging Markets Asia Local Currency Govt Country Capped Index, while SEAD.DE tracks JP Morgan USD Emerging Markets Diversified 3% capped 1-5 (EUR Hedged). They also come from different issuers: iShares and UBS. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IS0S.DE and 0.38% for SEAD.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS0S.DE and SEAD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer