PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS0R.DE vs. IUSQ.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS0R.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0R.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS0R.DE achieves a 2.44% return, which is significantly lower than IUSQ.DE's 12.65% return. Over the past 10 years, IS0R.DE has underperformed IUSQ.DE with an annualized return of 4.79%, while IUSQ.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 12.38% annualized return.


IS0R.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
1.07%
YTD
2.44%
6M
2.00%
1Y
5.17%
3Y*
5.34%
5Y*
4.94%
10Y*
4.79%

IUSQ.DE

1D
-0.23%
1M
3.68%
YTD
12.65%
6M
12.87%
1Y
26.39%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
12.42%
10Y*
12.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS0R.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS0R.DE
iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
2.44%-2.53%12.70%6.99%-3.38%12.70%-4.57%16.09%2.76%-7.28%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
12.65%9.02%24.53%18.57%-13.58%29.13%4.94%30.14%-5.97%9.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IS0R.DE and IUSQ.DE is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 11, 2014

0.62

Over the past year, the correlation between IS0R.DE and IUSQ.DE has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS0R.DE vs. IUSQ.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS0R.DE
IS0R.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
IS0R.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0R.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0R.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0R.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0R.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

IUSQ.DE
IUSQ.DE Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
IUSQ.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS0R.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0R.DE) and iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS0R.DEIUSQ.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.38

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.84

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.43

-0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

4.08

-2.43

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.16

16.69

-11.53

IS0R.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS0R.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the IUSQ.DE Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS0R.DE and IUSQ.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS0R.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

2.31

-1.38

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

0.88

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

0.82

-0.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.49

0.76

-0.27

Drawdowns

IS0R.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS0R.DE drawdown since its inception was -22.05%, smaller than the maximum IUSQ.DE drawdown of -33.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0R.DE and IUSQ.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS0R.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.05%

-33.60%

+11.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.11%

-6.48%

+3.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.44%

-21.25%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.44%

-21.25%

+9.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-22.05%

-33.60%

+11.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.26%

-0.55%

-2.71%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.74%

-4.19%

-0.55%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

1.59%

-0.59%

Volatility

IS0R.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0R.DE) is 0.84%, while iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc) (IUSQ.DE) has a volatility of 3.03%. This indicates that IS0R.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IUSQ.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS0R.DEIUSQ.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.84%

3.03%

-2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.65%

8.26%

-4.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.59%

11.47%

-5.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.66%

13.94%

-6.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.84%

15.02%

-6.18%

IS0R.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS0R.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IUSQ.DE's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS0R.DE vs. IUSQ.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS0R.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.21%, while IUSQ.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS0R.DE
iShares USD High Yield Corporate Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
6.21%6.34%6.27%5.74%4.94%4.18%5.22%5.46%5.65%5.88%5.32%6.00%
IUSQ.DE
iShares MSCI ACWI UCITS ETF (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS0R.DE and IUSQ.DE have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IUSQ.DE is cheaper at 0.20% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IUSQ.DE is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS0R.DE.

IS0R.DE is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while IUSQ.DE is Global Equities. IS0R.DE tracks iBoxx® USD Liquid High Yield Capped, while IUSQ.DE tracks MSCI All Country World (ACWI). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IS0R.DE and 0.20% for IUSQ.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS0R.DE and IUSQ.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer