IS0Q.DE vs. NQSE.DE
IS0Q.DE (iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and NQSE.DE (iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - IS0Q.DE is a Emerging Markets Bonds fund tracking the J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index, while NQSE.DE is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS0Q.DE returned 2.68%/yr vs 12.85%/yr for NQSE.DE. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. IS0Q.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for NQSE.DE.
Performance
IS0Q.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS0Q.DE achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than NQSE.DE's 14.72% return.
IS0Q.DE
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 4.52%
- YTD
- 4.68%
- 1Y
- 8.96%
- 3Y*
- 5.37%
- 5Y*
- 2.68%
- 10Y*
- 3.24%
NQSE.DE
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- -3.37%
- 6M
- 16.19%
- YTD
- 14.72%
- 1Y
- 26.71%
- 3Y*
- 22.71%
- 5Y*
- 12.85%
- 10Y*
- —
IS0Q.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0Q.DE iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 4.68% | -3.70% | 12.34% | 4.23% | -6.55% | 7.84% | -2.78% | 16.71% | 1.74% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 14.72% | 18.19% | 24.02% | 52.15% | -36.27% | 27.38% | 45.18% | 35.63% | -15.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0Q.DE and NQSE.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.04 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 10, 2018 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0Q.DE vs. NQSE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS0Q.DE
NQSE.DE
IS0Q.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0Q.DE) and iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IS0Q.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.27 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 2.24 | +0.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.52 | 7.50 | +1.02 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IS0Q.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0Q.DE drawdown since its inception was -26.03%, smaller than the maximum NQSE.DE drawdown of -37.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0Q.DE and NQSE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0Q.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.03% | -37.62% | +11.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.99% | -11.88% | +8.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.02% | -22.41% | +11.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -11.02% | -37.62% | +26.60% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -23.18% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.03% | -3.42% | +1.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.56% | -8.51% | +0.95% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.05% | 3.55% | -2.50% |
Volatility
IS0Q.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IS0Q.DE) is 1.46%, while iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF (NQSE.DE) has a volatility of 7.00%. This indicates that IS0Q.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NQSE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0Q.DE | NQSE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.46% | 7.00% | -5.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.76% | 13.51% | -9.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.48% | 17.21% | -11.73% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 21.11% | -14.07% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.77% | 21.59% | -12.82% |
IS0Q.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS0Q.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than NQSE.DE's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS0Q.DE vs. NQSE.DE - Dividend Comparison
IS0Q.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.50%, while NQSE.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0Q.DE iShares J.P. Morgan $ EM Corp Bond UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 5.50% | 5.61% | 5.36% | 5.07% | 4.31% | 3.54% | 4.14% | 4.58% | 4.69% | 4.55% | 4.51% | 5.13% |
NQSE.DE iShares NASDAQ 100 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0Q.DE and NQSE.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NQSE.DE is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NQSE.DE is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IS0Q.DE.
IS0Q.DE is categorized as Emerging Markets Bonds, while NQSE.DE is Nasdaq-100. IS0Q.DE tracks J.P. Morgan CEMBI Broad Diversified Core Index, while NQSE.DE tracks NASDAQ-100 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IS0Q.DE and 0.33% for NQSE.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS0Q.DE and NQSE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer