PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS0L.DE vs. XZEB.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS0L.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0L.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS0L.DE achieves a -0.09% return, which is significantly lower than XZEB.DE's 0.20% return.


IS0L.DE

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.08%
YTD
-0.09%
6M
-0.26%
1Y
-1.03%
3Y*
0.83%
5Y*
-3.06%
10Y*
-1.31%

XZEB.DE

1D
0.07%
1M
-0.04%
YTD
0.20%
6M
0.18%
1Y
-0.32%
3Y*
1.37%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS0L.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
IS0L.DE
iShares Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
-0.09%-1.50%0.13%5.16%-7.73%
XZEB.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.20%-0.59%0.01%5.77%-7.62%

Correlation

The correlation between IS0L.DE and XZEB.DE is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 11, 2022

0.98

The correlation between IS0L.DE and XZEB.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS0L.DE vs. XZEB.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS0L.DE
IS0L.DE Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
IS0L.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0L.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0L.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0L.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0L.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank

XZEB.DE
XZEB.DE Risk / Return Rank: 77
Overall Rank
XZEB.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 77
Calmar Ratio Rank
XZEB.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS0L.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0L.DE) and Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS0L.DEXZEB.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

0.97

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.48

-0.24

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.02

-0.53

-0.49

IS0L.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS0L.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.40, which is lower than the XZEB.DE Sharpe Ratio of -0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS0L.DE and XZEB.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS0L.DEXZEB.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.40

-0.17

-0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.50

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.25

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.03

-0.11

+0.08

Drawdowns

IS0L.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS0L.DE drawdown since its inception was -23.96%, which is greater than XZEB.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0L.DE and XZEB.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS0L.DEXZEB.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-23.96%

-13.98%

-9.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.93%

-2.97%

+0.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.96%

-4.45%

-0.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.24%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.49%

-7.28%

-12.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.79%

-8.40%

+0.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.39%

1.33%

+0.06%

Volatility

IS0L.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS0L.DE) is 1.37%, while Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF (XZEB.DE) has a volatility of 1.57%. This indicates that IS0L.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XZEB.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS0L.DEXZEB.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.37%

1.57%

-0.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.74%

3.45%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54%

4.14%

-0.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.10%

6.32%

-0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.27%

6.32%

-1.05%

IS0L.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS0L.DE has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than XZEB.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS0L.DE vs. XZEB.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS0L.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, while XZEB.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS0L.DE
iShares Germany Government Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
2.19%2.19%2.13%0.19%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.35%
XZEB.DE
Xtrackers II ESG Eurozone Government Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, IS0L.DE and XZEB.DE move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XZEB.DE is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XZEB.DE is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for IS0L.DE.

IS0L.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Treasury Germany, while XZEB.DE tracks FTSE ESG Select EMU Government Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for IS0L.DE and 0.15% for XZEB.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS0L.DE and XZEB.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer