IS0E.DE vs. EUNA.DE
IS0E.DE (iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF) and EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IS0E.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the S&P Commodity Producers Gold, while EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS0E.DE returned 19.77%/yr vs -1.29%/yr for EUNA.DE. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS0E.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EUNA.DE.
Performance
IS0E.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS0E.DE achieves a -0.06% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.46% return.
IS0E.DE
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- -5.38%
- YTD
- -0.06%
- 6M
- 7.39%
- 1Y
- 60.26%
- 3Y*
- 38.14%
- 5Y*
- 19.77%
- 10Y*
- 13.92%
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -0.12%
- YTD
- -0.46%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 1.32%
- 3Y*
- 2.28%
- 5Y*
- -1.29%
- 10Y*
- —
IS0E.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0E.DE iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF | -0.06% | 129.59% | 18.76% | 6.29% | -3.80% | -3.04% | 13.47% | 44.05% | -4.38% | 4.30% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.46% | 2.79% | 1.60% | 4.36% | -13.52% | -2.37% | 3.70% | 5.06% | -1.17% | -0.54% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0E.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2017 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0E.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS0E.DE
EUNA.DE
IS0E.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS0E.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.06 | +0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.17 | 0.43 | +1.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.45 | 1.18 | +4.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS0E.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.24 | 0.34 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | -0.28 | +0.85 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.43 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.18 | -0.05 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
IS0E.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0E.DE drawdown since its inception was -71.63%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0E.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0E.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.63% | -17.79% | -53.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.26% | -2.75% | -24.51% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.26% | -4.02% | -23.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.03% | -17.03% | -21.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.93% | -8.66% | -14.27% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -33.74% | -6.76% | -26.98% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.85% | 0.99% | +9.86% |
Volatility
IS0E.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Gold Producers UCITS ETF (IS0E.DE) has a higher volatility of 12.84% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 1.35%. This indicates that IS0E.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0E.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.84% | 1.35% | +11.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 33.62% | 2.82% | +30.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.58% | 3.46% | +44.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 33.83% | 4.64% | +29.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 32.53% | 4.27% | +28.26% |
IS0E.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS0E.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS0E.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS0E.DE nor EUNA.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0E.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IS0E.DE.
IS0E.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. IS0E.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Gold, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IS0E.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS0E.DE and EUNA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer