IS0D.DE vs. QCLN.DE
IS0D.DE (iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF) and QCLN.DE (First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - IS0D.DE tracks the S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while QCLN.DE tracks the S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IS0D.DE returned 17.33%/yr vs 2.29%/yr for QCLN.DE. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IS0D.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QCLN.DE.
Performance
IS0D.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS0D.DE achieves a 30.64% return, which is significantly lower than QCLN.DE's 49.11% return.
IS0D.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 30.64%
- 6M
- 22.28%
- 1Y
- 36.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
QCLN.DE
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- 14.22%
- YTD
- 49.11%
- 6M
- 44.27%
- 1Y
- 112.94%
- 3Y*
- 8.07%
- 5Y*
- 2.29%
- 10Y*
- —
IS0D.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0D.DE iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 30.64% | -4.44% | 3.13% | -0.98% | 44.39% | 51.30% |
QCLN.DE First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc | 49.11% | 16.50% | -14.54% | -10.39% | -26.09% | -12.74% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0D.DE and QCLN.DE is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2021 | 0.26 |
The correlation between IS0D.DE and QCLN.DE shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0D.DE vs. QCLN.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS0D.DE
QCLN.DE
IS0D.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (IS0D.DE) and First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS0D.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.44 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 7.93 | -5.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 24.33 | -19.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS0D.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 3.20 | -1.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.06 | +0.50 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | -0.08 | +0.17 |
Drawdowns
IS0D.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0D.DE drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, which is greater than QCLN.DE's maximum drawdown of -69.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0D.DE and QCLN.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0D.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.47% | -69.59% | -9.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.75% | -14.04% | -3.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.80% | -56.68% | +25.88% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.34% | -69.59% | +37.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.82% | -20.21% | +10.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.09% | -39.08% | +11.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.18% | 4.59% | +2.59% |
Volatility
IS0D.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (IS0D.DE) is 7.78%, while First Trust Nasdaq Clean Edge Green Energy UCITS ETF Acc (QCLN.DE) has a volatility of 14.59%. This indicates that IS0D.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QCLN.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0D.DE | QCLN.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 14.59% | -6.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.48% | 24.80% | -2.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.99% | 34.84% | -7.85% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.37% | 36.29% | -5.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.12% | 36.76% | -3.64% |
IS0D.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS0D.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is lower than QCLN.DE's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS0D.DE vs. QCLN.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS0D.DE nor QCLN.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0D.DE and QCLN.DE have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IS0D.DE is cheaper at 0.55% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IS0D.DE is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
IS0D.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production, while QCLN.DE tracks S&P Global Clean Energy TR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IS0D.DE and 0.60% for QCLN.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS0D.DE and QCLN.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer