PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS0D.DE vs. JMLP.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS0D.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (IS0D.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS0D.DE achieves a 30.64% return, which is significantly higher than JMLP.DE's 27.39% return.


IS0D.DE

1D
0.10%
1M
-3.31%
YTD
30.64%
6M
23.16%
1Y
36.10%
3Y*
11.88%
5Y*
17.33%
10Y*
6.95%

JMLP.DE

1D
-1.02%
1M
3.28%
YTD
27.39%
6M
23.64%
1Y
25.58%
3Y*
24.31%
5Y*
23.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS0D.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
IS0D.DE
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF
30.64%-4.44%3.13%-0.98%44.39%86.31%3.80%
JMLP.DE
HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF
27.39%-5.93%44.53%15.63%34.66%55.73%7.58%

Correlation

The correlation between IS0D.DE and JMLP.DE is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2020

0.73

The correlation between IS0D.DE and JMLP.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS0D.DE vs. JMLP.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS0D.DE
IS0D.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
IS0D.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS0D.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS0D.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
IS0D.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS0D.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

JMLP.DE
JMLP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3838
Overall Rank
JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3535
Sortino Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
JMLP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS0D.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (IS0D.DE) and HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS0D.DEJMLP.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.22

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.02

2.22

-0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.02

6.04

-1.02

IS0D.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS0D.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is comparable to the JMLP.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS0D.DE and JMLP.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS0D.DEJMLP.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.33

1.30

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.56

1.16

-0.60

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

1.35

-1.26

Drawdowns

IS0D.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS0D.DE drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, which is greater than JMLP.DE's maximum drawdown of -22.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0D.DE and JMLP.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS0D.DEJMLP.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.47%

-22.29%

-57.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.75%

-11.02%

-6.73%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.80%

-22.29%

-8.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.34%

-22.29%

-10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-73.73%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.82%

-5.15%

-4.67%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.09%

-5.87%

-21.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.18%

4.05%

+3.13%

Volatility

IS0D.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (IS0D.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF (JMLP.DE) at 6.65%. This indicates that IS0D.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JMLP.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS0D.DEJMLP.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

6.65%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.48%

15.30%

+7.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

26.99%

18.80%

+8.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.37%

20.38%

+9.99%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.12%

21.66%

+11.46%

IS0D.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS0D.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than JMLP.DE's 0.40% expense ratio.


Dividends

IS0D.DE vs. JMLP.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS0D.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JMLP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.77%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
IS0D.DE
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JMLP.DE
HANetf Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend UCITS ETF
2.77%3.38%5.41%11.39%11.27%14.07%8.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS0D.DE and JMLP.DE have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JMLP.DE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JMLP.DE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IS0D.DE.

IS0D.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production, while JMLP.DE tracks Alerian Midstream Energy Dividend. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HANetf. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IS0D.DE and 0.40% for JMLP.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS0D.DE and JMLP.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer