IS0D.DE vs. AMEE.DE
IS0D.DE (iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF) and AMEE.DE (Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc) are both Energy Equities funds - IS0D.DE tracks the S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production while AMEE.DE tracks the Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IS0D.DE returned 6.95%/yr vs 15.13%/yr for AMEE.DE. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IS0D.DE charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for AMEE.DE.
Performance
IS0D.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IS0D.DE achieves a 30.64% return, which is significantly higher than AMEE.DE's 27.83% return. Over the past 10 years, IS0D.DE has underperformed AMEE.DE with an annualized return of 6.95%, while AMEE.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 15.13% annualized return.
IS0D.DE
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- 1.29%
- YTD
- 30.64%
- 6M
- 22.28%
- 1Y
- 36.59%
- 3Y*
- 11.88%
- 5Y*
- 17.33%
- 10Y*
- 6.95%
AMEE.DE
- 1D
- -0.87%
- 1M
- -3.42%
- YTD
- 27.83%
- 6M
- 25.69%
- 1Y
- 62.63%
- 3Y*
- 32.97%
- 5Y*
- 28.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.13%
IS0D.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IS0D.DE iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF | 30.64% | -4.44% | 3.13% | -0.98% | 44.39% | 86.31% | -39.08% | 13.51% | -18.94% | -15.78% |
AMEE.DE Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc | 27.83% | 37.58% | 15.56% | 12.19% | 35.81% | 34.64% | -31.29% | 10.32% | -0.78% | 5.51% |
Correlation
The correlation between IS0D.DE and AMEE.DE is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 3, 2012 | 0.66 |
Over the past year, the correlation between IS0D.DE and AMEE.DE has dropped to 0.01 - well below their long-term average of 0.66, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IS0D.DE vs. AMEE.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IS0D.DE
AMEE.DE
IS0D.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (IS0D.DE) and Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IS0D.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.38 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.52 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 7.71 | -5.69 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.02 | 23.88 | -18.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IS0D.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.33 | 3.24 | -1.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 1.27 | -0.71 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 | 0.58 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.41 | -0.32 |
Drawdowns
IS0D.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IS0D.DE drawdown since its inception was -79.47%, which is greater than AMEE.DE's maximum drawdown of -59.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS0D.DE and AMEE.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IS0D.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -79.47% | -59.14% | -20.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.75% | -7.92% | -9.83% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -30.80% | -15.74% | -15.06% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -32.34% | -19.23% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -73.73% | -59.14% | -14.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -9.82% | -3.54% | -6.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.09% | -10.65% | -16.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.18% | 2.56% | +4.62% |
Volatility
IS0D.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares Oil & Gas Exploration & Production UCITS ETF (IS0D.DE) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Amundi Global Hydrogen ESG Screened UCITS ETF EUR Acc (AMEE.DE) at 7.10%. This indicates that IS0D.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AMEE.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IS0D.DE | AMEE.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.78% | 7.10% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.48% | 14.18% | +8.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 26.99% | 18.89% | +8.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.37% | 22.25% | +8.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 33.12% | 25.74% | +7.38% |
IS0D.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IS0D.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than AMEE.DE's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
IS0D.DE vs. AMEE.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IS0D.DE nor AMEE.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IS0D.DE and AMEE.DE have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AMEE.DE is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AMEE.DE is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for IS0D.DE.
IS0D.DE tracks S&P Commodity Producers Oil & Gas Exploration & Production, while AMEE.DE tracks Bloomberg Hydrogen ESG. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for IS0D.DE and 0.45% for AMEE.DE.
Find the right allocation for IS0D.DE and AMEE.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer