PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS04.DE vs. SYBW.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS04.DE vs. SYBW.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS04.DE) and State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS04.DE achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than SYBW.DE's 3.77% return. Over the past 10 years, IS04.DE has underperformed SYBW.DE with an annualized return of -2.46%, while SYBW.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 1.29% annualized return.


IS04.DE

1D
0.74%
1M
-0.54%
6M
-0.18%
YTD
1.63%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
-2.54%
5Y*
-6.77%
10Y*
-2.46%

SYBW.DE

1D
0.14%
1M
1.61%
6M
2.39%
YTD
3.77%
1Y
4.75%
3Y*
3.60%
5Y*
2.52%
10Y*
1.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS04.DE vs. SYBW.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IS04.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
1.63%-7.08%-2.45%-1.26%-25.93%3.50%6.45%18.16%2.87%-4.41%
SYBW.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.77%-6.50%9.98%0.49%2.02%7.59%-6.16%5.97%6.10%-11.87%

Correlation

The correlation between IS04.DE and SYBW.DE is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.27

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 19, 2015

0.41

The correlation between IS04.DE and SYBW.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.27 (3 years) to 0.41 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS04.DE vs. SYBW.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS04.DE
IS04.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
IS04.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

SYBW.DE
SYBW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SYBW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
SYBW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS04.DE vs. SYBW.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS04.DE) and State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


IS04.DESYBW.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.35

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.15

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.68

1.34

-0.67

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.42

3.36

-1.94

IS04.DE vs. SYBW.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS04.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.53, which is lower than the SYBW.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.87. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS04.DE and SYBW.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

IS04.DE vs. SYBW.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS04.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.19%, which is greater than SYBW.DE's maximum drawdown of -28.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS04.DE and SYBW.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS04.DESYBW.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.19%

-28.24%

-18.95%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.43%

-3.52%

-3.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.34%

-10.87%

-7.47%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.96%

-12.61%

-27.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.19%

-20.37%

-26.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.27%

-5.13%

-38.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-22.93%

-9.74%

-13.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.54%

1.40%

+2.14%

Volatility

IS04.DE vs. SYBW.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS04.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.62% compared to State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist) (SYBW.DE) at 1.12%. This indicates that IS04.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SYBW.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS04.DESYBW.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.62%

1.12%

+1.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.63%

3.89%

+2.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.84%

5.46%

+4.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.22%

7.16%

+8.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.59%

10.47%

+4.12%

IS04.DE vs. SYBW.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IS04.DE has a 0.07% expense ratio, which is higher than SYBW.DE's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS04.DE vs. SYBW.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS04.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.68%, more than SYBW.DE's 3.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IS04.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.68%4.38%4.61%3.82%3.04%1.71%1.86%2.49%2.78%2.73%2.57%2.14%
SYBW.DE
State Street SPDR Bloomberg 1-3 Year U.S. Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (Dist)
3.82%4.34%3.98%3.01%0.64%0.54%1.91%2.03%1.33%1.05%0.68%0.53%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS04.DE and SYBW.DE have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SYBW.DE is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SYBW.DE is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.07% for IS04.DE.

IS04.DE tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while SYBW.DE tracks Bloomberg U.S. 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.07% for IS04.DE and 0.05% for SYBW.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS04.DE and SYBW.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer