PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IS04.DE vs. BBLL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IS04.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS04.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IS04.DE achieves a 0.81% return, which is significantly lower than BBLL.DE's 2.66% return.


IS04.DE

1D
0.41%
1M
1.45%
YTD
0.81%
6M
-0.81%
1Y
2.13%
3Y*
-4.20%
5Y*
-5.21%
10Y*
-1.74%

BBLL.DE

1D
-0.11%
1M
1.01%
YTD
2.66%
6M
2.06%
1Y
2.10%
3Y*
1.85%
5Y*
4.31%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IS04.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
IS04.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
0.81%-6.95%-2.51%-1.21%-26.01%3.49%6.49%5.99%
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
2.66%-7.37%11.29%1.32%7.29%8.35%-8.23%1.14%

Correlation

The correlation between IS04.DE and BBLL.DE is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.23

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.27

The correlation between IS04.DE and BBLL.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (3 years) to 0.27 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IS04.DE vs. BBLL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IS04.DE
IS04.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
IS04.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
IS04.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLL.DE
BBLL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IS04.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS04.DE) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IS04.DEBBLL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.13

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.06

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.29

0.62

-0.33

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.62

1.30

-0.69

IS04.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IS04.DE Sharpe Ratio is 0.22, which is lower than the BBLL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IS04.DE and BBLL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IS04.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.22

0.34

-0.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.34

0.57

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.09

0.29

-0.39

Drawdowns

IS04.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IS04.DE drawdown since its inception was -47.19%, which is greater than BBLL.DE's maximum drawdown of -13.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IS04.DE and BBLL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IS04.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.19%

-13.03%

-34.16%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.33%

-3.38%

-3.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.47%

-11.65%

-6.82%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.05%

-11.65%

-28.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.69%

-7.22%

-36.47%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.89%

-6.14%

-15.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.45%

1.61%

+1.84%

Volatility

IS04.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist) (IS04.DE) has a higher volatility of 2.47% compared to JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (BBLL.DE) at 1.28%. This indicates that IS04.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IS04.DEBBLL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.47%

1.28%

+1.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.52%

4.12%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.70%

6.07%

+3.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.21%

7.46%

+7.75%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.69%

7.22%

+7.47%

IS04.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both IS04.DE and BBLL.DE have an expense ratio of 0.07%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

IS04.DE vs. BBLL.DE - Dividend Comparison

IS04.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.35%, while BBLL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BBLL.DE
JPMorgan BetaBuilders US Treasury Bond 0-1 yr UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IS04.DE
iShares USD Treasury Bond 20+yr UCITS ETF (Dist)
4.35%4.38%4.62%3.82%3.04%1.71%1.86%2.49%2.79%2.72%2.56%2.14%

Frequently Asked Questions


IS04.DE and BBLL.DE have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.07% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IS04.DE and BBLL.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.07% per year.

IS04.DE tracks ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index, while BBLL.DE tracks ICE US Treasury 0-1 Year Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IS04.DE and BBLL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer