PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IRSNX vs. FHCDX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IRSNX vs. FHCDX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Voya Target Retirement 2035 Fund (IRSNX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IRSNX achieves a 9.29% return, which is significantly lower than FHCDX's 13.36% return.


IRSNX

1D
-0.63%
1M
2.98%
YTD
9.29%
6M
9.85%
1Y
22.27%
3Y*
16.17%
5Y*
7.91%
10Y*
10.11%

FHCDX

1D
-0.58%
1M
3.73%
YTD
13.36%
6M
14.66%
1Y
29.91%
3Y*
21.32%
5Y*
10.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IRSNX vs. FHCDX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
IRSNX
Voya Target Retirement 2035 Fund
9.29%17.23%12.30%17.56%-17.97%15.51%15.76%22.33%-10.04%
FHCDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6
13.36%22.85%16.96%20.69%-18.85%16.45%18.05%26.63%-11.79%

Correlation

The correlation between IRSNX and FHCDX is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.93

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.96

The correlation between IRSNX and FHCDX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IRSNX vs. FHCDX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IRSNX
IRSNX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
IRSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IRSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
IRSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
IRSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
IRSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

FHCDX
FHCDX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FHCDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHCDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHCDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
FHCDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHCDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IRSNX vs. FHCDX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Voya Target Retirement 2035 Fund (IRSNX) and Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IRSNXFHCDXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.49

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

1.45

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

3.18

+0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.95

14.13

+1.81

IRSNX vs. FHCDX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IRSNX Sharpe Ratio is 2.60, which is comparable to the FHCDX Sharpe Ratio of 2.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IRSNX and FHCDX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IRSNXFHCDXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60

2.41

+0.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.71

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.75

0.73

+0.02

Drawdowns

IRSNX vs. FHCDX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IRSNX drawdown since its inception was -29.52%, smaller than the maximum FHCDX drawdown of -31.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRSNX and FHCDX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IRSNXFHCDXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.52%

-31.28%

+1.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.45%

-9.68%

+2.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.03%

-15.51%

+3.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.44%

-27.69%

+3.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.58%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.11%

-5.83%

+1.72%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

2.17%

-0.67%

Volatility

IRSNX vs. FHCDX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Voya Target Retirement 2035 Fund (IRSNX) is 3.07%, while Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6 (FHCDX) has a volatility of 4.24%. This indicates that IRSNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FHCDX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IRSNXFHCDXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.07%

4.24%

-1.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.85%

10.48%

-2.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.55%

12.74%

-3.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.40%

15.12%

-2.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.45%

16.90%

-3.45%

IRSNX vs. FHCDX - Expense Ratio Comparison

IRSNX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than FHCDX's 0.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

IRSNX vs. FHCDX - Dividend Comparison

IRSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.80%, more than FHCDX's 3.33% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHCDX
Fidelity Freedom Blend 2060 Fund Class K6
3.33%2.52%5.51%2.05%5.98%8.10%4.24%3.04%3.50%0.00%0.00%0.00%
IRSNX
Voya Target Retirement 2035 Fund
8.80%9.62%2.15%2.25%6.05%17.46%4.26%4.23%6.04%6.30%1.73%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


IRSNX and FHCDX have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FHCDX has higher volatility (4.24%) compared to IRSNX (3.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, IRSNX dropped -29.52% vs FHCDX's -31.28%.

IRSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.60 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IRSNX and FHCDX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer