IRSA.L vs. JRDM.L
IRSA.L (iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and JRDM.L (JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist)) are both Emerging Markets Equities funds - IRSA.L tracks the MSCI South Africa 20/35 Index while JRDM.L tracks the MSCI EM NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IRSA.L returned 20.15%/yr vs 362.94%/yr for JRDM.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRSA.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for JRDM.L.
Performance
IRSA.L vs. JRDM.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
IRSA.L is traded in USD, while JRDM.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JRDM.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRSA.L achieves a -8.47% return, which is significantly lower than JRDM.L's 22.95% return.
IRSA.L
- 1D
- -1.05%
- 1M
- -4.86%
- 6M
- -13.79%
- YTD
- -8.47%
- 1Y
- 22.03%
- 3Y*
- 20.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.32%
- 10Y*
- 6.11%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.08%
JRDM.L
- 1D
- 2.35%
- 1M
- -6.51%
- 6M
- 17.22%
- YTD
- 22.95%
- 1Y
- 202.54%
- 3Y*
- 362.94%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 131.38%
IRSA.L vs. JRDM.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRSA.L iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -8.47% | 76.74% | 7.84% | 0.20% | -3.75% | -2.62% |
JRDM.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 22.95% | 7,405.66% | 6.70% | 6.72% | -20.81% | -29.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRSA.L and JRDM.L is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 15, 2021 | 0.67 |
The correlation between IRSA.L and JRDM.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.64 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
IRSA.L vs. JRDM.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IRSA.L
JRDM.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
IRSA.L
JRDM.L
Basic Materials
IRSA.L
JRDM.L
Communication Services
IRSA.L
JRDM.L
Consumer Cyclical
IRSA.L
JRDM.L
Consumer Defensive
IRSA.L
JRDM.L
Real Estate
IRSA.L
JRDM.L
Industrials
IRSA.L
JRDM.L
Healthcare
IRSA.L
JRDM.L
Energy
IRSA.L
-
JRDM.L
Technology
IRSA.L
-
JRDM.L
Utilities
IRSA.L
-
JRDM.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRSA.L vs. JRDM.L — Risk / Return Rank
IRSA.L
JRDM.L
IRSA.L vs. JRDM.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IRSA.L) and JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRSA.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.04 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -9.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 2.39 | -1.26 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.96 | 15.74 | -14.78 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.02 | 49.10 | -47.08 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRSA.L vs. JRDM.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRSA.L drawdown since its inception was -61.84%, which is greater than JRDM.L's maximum drawdown of -52.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRSA.L and JRDM.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRSA.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.84% | -52.52% | -9.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.87% | -12.79% | -10.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -16.06% | -6.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.87% | -7.95% | -14.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.86% | -29.36% | +11.50% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.88% | 4.11% | +6.77% |
Volatility
IRSA.L vs. JRDM.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IRSA.L) is 6.71%, while JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) (JRDM.L) has a volatility of 9.73%. This indicates that IRSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JRDM.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRSA.L | JRDM.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.71% | 9.73% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.34% | 19.68% | +7.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.56% | 117.20% | -84.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.67% | 504.68% | -476.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 504.68% | -474.90% |
IRSA.L vs. JRDM.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRSA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JRDM.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRSA.L vs. JRDM.L - Dividend Comparison
IRSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JRDM.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 44.72%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRSA.L iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JRDM.L JPMorgan Global Emerging Markets Research Enhanced Index Equity (ESG) UCITS ETF USD (dist) | 44.72% | 171.80% | 2.24% | 2.42% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRSA.L and JRDM.L have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JRDM.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JRDM.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for IRSA.L.
IRSA.L tracks MSCI South Africa 20/35 Index, while JRDM.L tracks MSCI EM NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IRSA.L and 0.30% for JRDM.L.
Find the right allocation for IRSA.L and JRDM.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer