IRSA.L vs. IDTW.L
IRSA.L (iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IDTW.L (iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - IRSA.L is a Emerging Markets Equities fund tracking the MSCI South Africa 20/35 Index, while IDTW.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, IRSA.L returned 6.22%/yr vs 20.46%/yr for IDTW.L. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. IRSA.L charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for IDTW.L.
Performance
IRSA.L vs. IDTW.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IRSA.L achieves a -7.51% return, which is significantly lower than IDTW.L's 58.99% return. Over the past 10 years, IRSA.L has underperformed IDTW.L with an annualized return of 6.22%, while IDTW.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.46% annualized return.
IRSA.L
- 1D
- 1.05%
- 1M
- -3.86%
- 6M
- -13.31%
- YTD
- -7.51%
- 1Y
- 21.92%
- 3Y*
- 20.57%
- 5Y*
- 10.47%
- 10Y*
- 6.22%
- ALL TIME*
- 5.15%
IDTW.L
- 1D
- 4.62%
- 1M
- -7.41%
- 6M
- 49.55%
- YTD
- 58.99%
- 1Y
- 81.14%
- 3Y*
- 41.20%
- 5Y*
- 20.35%
- 10Y*
- 20.46%
- ALL TIME*
- 12.29%
IRSA.L vs. IDTW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IRSA.L iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | -7.51% | 76.74% | 7.84% | 0.20% | -3.75% | 3.99% | -2.70% | 8.62% | -24.11% | 34.90% |
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 58.99% | 31.78% | 23.61% | 28.84% | -29.55% | 28.51% | 34.35% | 34.44% | -9.12% | 28.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between IRSA.L and IDTW.L is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 22, 2010 | 0.61 |
The correlation between IRSA.L and IDTW.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.52 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.
IRSA.L vs. IDTW.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
IRSA.L
IDTW.L
Financial Services
Basic Materials
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Real Estate
-
Industrials
Healthcare
Energy
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
IRSA.L
IDTW.L
Basic Materials
IRSA.L
IDTW.L
Communication Services
IRSA.L
IDTW.L
Consumer Cyclical
IRSA.L
IDTW.L
Consumer Defensive
IRSA.L
IDTW.L
Real Estate
IRSA.L
IDTW.L
-
Industrials
IRSA.L
IDTW.L
Healthcare
IRSA.L
IDTW.L
Energy
IRSA.L
-
IDTW.L
-
Technology
IRSA.L
-
IDTW.L
Utilities
IRSA.L
-
IDTW.L
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IRSA.L vs. IDTW.L — Risk / Return Rank
IRSA.L
IDTW.L
IRSA.L vs. IDTW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IRSA.L) and iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IRSA.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.15 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.46 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.95 | 5.58 | -4.63 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.99 | 17.71 | -15.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IRSA.L vs. IDTW.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IRSA.L drawdown since its inception was -61.84%, roughly equal to the maximum IDTW.L drawdown of -60.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IRSA.L and IDTW.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IRSA.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -61.84% | -60.07% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.87% | -14.46% | -8.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.87% | -28.24% | +5.37% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -34.44% | -40.98% | +6.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.84% | -40.98% | -20.86% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.06% | -10.39% | -11.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.86% | -12.59% | -5.27% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 10.97% | 4.57% | +6.40% |
Volatility
IRSA.L vs. IDTW.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IRSA.L) is 6.77%, while iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IDTW.L) has a volatility of 12.55%. This indicates that IRSA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IDTW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IRSA.L | IDTW.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.77% | 12.55% | -5.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.36% | 25.11% | +2.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.51% | 28.56% | +3.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 28.66% | 24.04% | +4.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.78% | 22.46% | +7.32% |
IRSA.L vs. IDTW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
IRSA.L has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than IDTW.L's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
IRSA.L vs. IDTW.L - Dividend Comparison
IRSA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IDTW.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IDTW.L iShares MSCI Taiwan UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.95% | 1.51% | 1.43% | 2.09% | 3.39% | 1.35% | 1.73% | 2.15% | 2.78% | 2.70% | 3.10% | 3.33% |
IRSA.L iShares MSCI South Africa UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IRSA.L and IDTW.L have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IRSA.L is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IRSA.L is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.74% for IDTW.L.
IRSA.L is categorized as Emerging Markets Equities, while IDTW.L is Technology Equities. IRSA.L tracks MSCI South Africa 20/35 Index, while IDTW.L tracks MSCI Taiwan 20/35 Index (Net) (USD). Their fees differ too: 0.65% for IRSA.L and 0.74% for IDTW.L.
Find the right allocation for IRSA.L and IDTW.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer