IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

IQSA.L (Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and FWRA.L (Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation) are both Global Equities funds from Invesco. IQSA.L is actively managed, while FWRA.L is passively managed. Over the past year, IQSA.L returned 30.89% vs 28.82% for FWRA.L. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. IQSA.L charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for FWRA.L.

Performance

IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQSA.L achieves a 14.07% return, which is significantly higher than FWRA.L's 11.59% return.

IQSA.L

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 5.34%
• YTD: 14.07%
• 6M: 16.56%
• 1Y: 30.89%
• 3Y*: 25.43%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: —

FWRA.L

• 1D: -0.13%
• 1M: 4.28%
• YTD: 11.59%
• 6M: 13.01%
• 1Y: 28.82%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
IQSA.L Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc	14.07%	22.67%	22.82%	10.21%
FWRA.L Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation	11.59%	22.37%	18.07%	9.23%

Correlation

The correlation between IQSA.L and FWRA.L is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.94
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 30, 2023	0.92

The correlation between IQSA.L and FWRA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	IQSA.L	FWRA.L
Technology	33.0%	29.1%
Financial Services	21.2%	16.4%
Industrials	13.3%	11.0%
Communication Services	11.3%	8.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.9%	9.4%
Healthcare	7.3%	7.6%
Basic Materials	3.7%	3.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.8%	5.0%
Utilities	0.3%	2.6%
Real Estate	0.3%	1.9%
Energy	-	4.3%

Return for Risk

IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQSA.L

IQSA.L Risk / Return Rank: 76
IQSA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
IQSA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 80
IQSA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
IQSA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
IQSA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 79

FWRA.L

FWRA.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 72
FWRA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
FWRA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 73
FWRA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
FWRA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L) and Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	IQSA.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.35	2.32	+0.03
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.54	3.44	+0.10
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.43	1.43	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.55	3.27	+0.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.35	13.70	+1.65
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQSA.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the FWRA.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQSA.L and FWRA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	IQSA.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.35	2.32	+0.03
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.87	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.92	1.56	-0.64

Drawdowns

IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQSA.L drawdown since its inception was -34.64%, which is greater than FWRA.L's maximum drawdown of -16.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSA.L and FWRA.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	IQSA.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-34.64%	-16.60%	-18.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.65%	-8.74%	+0.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.67%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-0.77%	+0.24%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.91%	-1.93%	-2.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.01%	2.09%	-0.08%

Volatility

IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.L) has a higher volatility of 4.00% compared to Invesco FTSE All-World UCITS ETF USD Accumulation (FWRA.L) at 3.80%. This indicates that IQSA.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FWRA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	IQSA.L	FWRA.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.00%	3.80%	+0.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.26%	9.86%	+0.40%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.06%	12.32%	+0.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.54%	13.52%	+3.02%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.14%	13.52%	+4.62%

IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQSA.L has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than FWRA.L's 0.15% expense ratio.

Dividends

IQSA.L vs. FWRA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither IQSA.L nor FWRA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both IQSA.L and FWRA.L in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.94, IQSA.L and FWRA.L move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, IQSA.L or FWRA.L?

On fees, FWRA.L is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, IQSA.L or FWRA.L?

FWRA.L is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for IQSA.L.

What is the main difference between IQSA.L and FWRA.L?

Their fees differ too: 0.30% for IQSA.L and 0.15% for FWRA.L.