IQSA.DE vs. CBUI.DE
IQSA.DE (Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc) and CBUI.DE (iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both Global Equities funds. IQSA.DE is actively managed, while CBUI.DE is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, IQSA.DE returned 22.03%/yr vs 21.76%/yr for CBUI.DE. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.30% expense ratio.
Performance
IQSA.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQSA.DE achieves a 14.81% return, which is significantly lower than CBUI.DE's 20.05% return.
IQSA.DE
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 6.18%
- YTD
- 14.81%
- 6M
- 16.74%
- 1Y
- 28.62%
- 3Y*
- 22.03%
- 5Y*
- 15.45%
- 10Y*
- —
CBUI.DE
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 8.37%
- YTD
- 20.05%
- 6M
- 22.81%
- 1Y
- 44.12%
- 3Y*
- 21.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IQSA.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQSA.DE Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc | 14.81% | 9.64% | 29.92% | 20.24% | -9.32% | 6.35% |
CBUI.DE iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc | 20.05% | 20.98% | 13.82% | 15.94% | -6.30% | 6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQSA.DE and CBUI.DE is 0.82, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.85 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 1, 2021 | 0.90 |
The correlation between IQSA.DE and CBUI.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQSA.DE vs. CBUI.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQSA.DE
CBUI.DE
IQSA.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.DE) and iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| IQSA.DE | CBUI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.07 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.43 | 1.60 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.60 | 6.92 | -2.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.23 | 26.41 | -8.18 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| IQSA.DE | CBUI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.34 | 3.41 | -1.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.94 | 1.05 | -0.11 |
Drawdowns
IQSA.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQSA.DE drawdown since its inception was -34.11%, which is greater than CBUI.DE's maximum drawdown of -19.48%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQSA.DE and CBUI.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQSA.DE | CBUI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.11% | -19.48% | -14.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.20% | -6.34% | +0.14% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.35% | -19.48% | -1.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.35% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -0.22% | -0.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.38% | -3.23% | -1.15% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.57% | 1.67% | -0.10% |
Volatility
IQSA.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco Global Active ESG Equity UCITS ETF USD Acc (IQSA.DE) is 3.32%, while iShares MSCI World Value Factor ESG UCITS ETF USD Acc (CBUI.DE) has a volatility of 3.73%. This indicates that IQSA.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CBUI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQSA.DE | CBUI.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.32% | 3.73% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.85% | 9.76% | -0.91% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.17% | 12.88% | -0.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.71% | 14.21% | +0.50% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.74% | 14.21% | +2.53% |
IQSA.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both IQSA.DE and CBUI.DE have an expense ratio of 0.30%.
Dividends
IQSA.DE vs. CBUI.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither IQSA.DE nor CBUI.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
IQSA.DE and CBUI.DE have a correlation of 0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Both ETFs have the same 0.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IQSA.DE and CBUI.DE have the same expense ratio: 0.30% per year.
They also come from different issuers: Invesco and iShares.
Find the right allocation for IQSA.DE and CBUI.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer