IQQW.DE vs. EUNA.DE
IQQW.DE (iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and EUNA.DE (iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - IQQW.DE is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while EUNA.DE is a Global Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, IQQW.DE returned 11.94%/yr vs -1.36%/yr for EUNA.DE. At a 0.03 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. IQQW.DE charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for EUNA.DE.
Performance
IQQW.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, IQQW.DE achieves a 12.38% return, which is significantly higher than EUNA.DE's -0.40% return.
IQQW.DE
- 1D
- 0.43%
- 1M
- 1.51%
- 6M
- 12.34%
- YTD
- 12.38%
- 1Y
- 23.86%
- 3Y*
- 17.17%
- 5Y*
- 11.94%
- 10Y*
- 12.69%
EUNA.DE
- 1D
- -0.20%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- 6M
- 0.20%
- YTD
- -0.40%
- 1Y
- 0.82%
- 3Y*
- 2.34%
- 5Y*
- -1.36%
- 10Y*
- —
IQQW.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
IQQW.DE iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 12.38% | 7.59% | 25.52% | 19.92% | -13.90% | 32.21% | 5.13% | 30.90% | -5.28% | 1.77% |
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | -0.40% | 2.91% | 1.48% | 4.41% | -13.52% | -2.42% | 3.86% | 5.07% | -1.20% | -0.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between IQQW.DE and EUNA.DE is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.28 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.10 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2017 | 0.03 |
Over the past year, IQQW.DE and EUNA.DE have become more correlated (0.28) than their long-term average of 0.03, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
IQQW.DE vs. EUNA.DE — Risk / Return Rank
IQQW.DE
EUNA.DE
IQQW.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQW.DE) and iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| IQQW.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.90 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.04 | +0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.60 | 0.29 | +3.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.30 | 0.78 | +13.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
IQQW.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum IQQW.DE drawdown since its inception was -52.35%, which is greater than EUNA.DE's maximum drawdown of -17.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQW.DE and EUNA.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| IQQW.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.35% | -17.81% | -34.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.61% | -2.80% | -3.81% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.66% | -4.11% | -17.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.66% | -17.04% | -4.62% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.65% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.10% | -8.53% | +8.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.01% | -6.71% | -2.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.66% | 1.05% | +0.61% |
Volatility
IQQW.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (IQQW.DE) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc (EUNA.DE) at 0.86%. This indicates that IQQW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EUNA.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| IQQW.DE | EUNA.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.28% | 0.86% | +2.42% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.96% | 2.83% | +5.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.26% | 3.73% | +7.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 4.84% | +9.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.03% | 4.44% | +10.59% |
IQQW.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
IQQW.DE has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than EUNA.DE's 0.10% expense ratio.
Dividends
IQQW.DE vs. EUNA.DE - Dividend Comparison
IQQW.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.86%, while EUNA.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EUNA.DE iShares Core Global Aggregate Bond UCITS ETF (EUR Hedged) Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IQQW.DE iShares MSCI World UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 0.86% | 0.95% | 1.05% | 1.32% | 1.49% | 1.01% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.84% | 1.66% | 1.70% | 1.80% |
Frequently Asked Questions
IQQW.DE and EUNA.DE have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, EUNA.DE is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
EUNA.DE is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for IQQW.DE.
IQQW.DE is categorized as Global Equities, while EUNA.DE is Global Bonds. IQQW.DE tracks MSCI World Index, while EUNA.DE tracks Bloomberg Global Aggregate Bond (EUR Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.50% for IQQW.DE and 0.10% for EUNA.DE.
Find the right allocation for IQQW.DE and EUNA.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer