PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
IQQP.DE vs. H4ZL.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

IQQP.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQP.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, IQQP.DE achieves a 0.31% return, which is significantly lower than H4ZL.DE's 6.32% return. Over the past 10 years, IQQP.DE has underperformed H4ZL.DE with an annualized return of 0.54%, while H4ZL.DE has yielded a comparatively higher 2.35% annualized return.


IQQP.DE

1D
0.51%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
0.31%
6M
1.57%
1Y
-1.56%
3Y*
10.88%
5Y*
-4.17%
10Y*
0.54%

H4ZL.DE

1D
-0.02%
1M
-2.45%
YTD
6.32%
6M
5.97%
1Y
6.50%
3Y*
3.13%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
2.35%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

IQQP.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
IQQP.DE
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
0.31%8.56%-0.81%17.81%-37.23%8.18%-8.95%26.21%-7.04%14.56%
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
6.32%-4.65%2.27%6.12%-20.22%36.90%-16.99%23.91%-0.81%-2.27%

Correlation

The correlation between IQQP.DE and H4ZL.DE is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.60

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 30, 2013

0.62

The correlation between IQQP.DE and H4ZL.DE has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

IQQP.DE vs. H4ZL.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

IQQP.DE
IQQP.DE Risk / Return Rank: 88
Overall Rank
IQQP.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IQQP.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
Sortino Ratio Rank
IQQP.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 88
Omega Ratio Rank
IQQP.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
IQQP.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

H4ZL.DE
H4ZL.DE Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
H4ZL.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

IQQP.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQP.DE) and HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


IQQP.DEH4ZL.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.92

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

1.11

-0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.10

0.84

-0.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.26

2.48

-2.74

IQQP.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current IQQP.DE Sharpe Ratio is -0.10, which is lower than the H4ZL.DE Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of IQQP.DE and H4ZL.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


IQQP.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.10

0.59

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.19

0.02

-0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

0.14

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.29

-0.11

Drawdowns

IQQP.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum IQQP.DE drawdown since its inception was -64.70%, which is greater than H4ZL.DE's maximum drawdown of -41.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for IQQP.DE and H4ZL.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


IQQP.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.70%

-41.97%

-22.73%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.07%

-7.82%

-7.25%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.28%

-20.68%

+3.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-49.34%

-30.45%

-18.89%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.23%

-41.97%

-8.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.93%

-13.81%

-13.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.15%

-10.80%

-9.35%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.66%

2.67%

+2.99%

Volatility

IQQP.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Volatility Comparison

iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF (IQQP.DE) has a higher volatility of 4.69% compared to HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD (H4ZL.DE) at 2.88%. This indicates that IQQP.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than H4ZL.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


IQQP.DEH4ZL.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.69%

2.88%

+1.81%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.72%

8.34%

+4.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.91%

11.21%

+3.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.49%

14.69%

+6.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.40%

16.27%

+3.13%

IQQP.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

IQQP.DE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than H4ZL.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

IQQP.DE vs. H4ZL.DE - Dividend Comparison

IQQP.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.89%, while H4ZL.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
H4ZL.DE
HSBC FTSE EPRA NAREIT Developed UCITS ETF USD
0.00%0.00%0.00%2.63%3.62%2.19%3.13%2.95%3.29%3.08%2.96%2.67%
IQQP.DE
iShares European Property Yield UCITS ETF
2.89%2.89%2.75%2.65%4.34%2.07%2.64%2.92%3.33%2.83%2.61%2.62%

Frequently Asked Questions


IQQP.DE and H4ZL.DE have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, H4ZL.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

H4ZL.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IQQP.DE.

IQQP.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed Europe ex UK Dividend+, while H4ZL.DE tracks FTSE EPRA/NAREIT Developed. They also come from different issuers: iShares and HSBC. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for IQQP.DE and 0.24% for H4ZL.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for IQQP.DE and H4ZL.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer